МЕДИЦИНСКАЯ ВАЛЕОЛОГИЯ
43
Results and discussion:
After the end of rehabilitation there was a significant
increase in the number of patients who terminated the test
due to reaching the prescribed level of heart rate in the
main group of 84.3% in the control to 40%. Differences
in treatment efficiency in the main and control group
these figures were accurate.
It was observed that all patients had a significant
increase and endurance to physical strains as the result of
implementation of the program training implementation.
However, during the study it was observed that the
increase of tolerance to physical loads in patients with
baseline low or the average level threshold of the load
held in the main and selected those with the threshold
power until the beginning of physical therapy was below
average: males < 5 IU. Only with the relevant source
exercise tolerance, there were 22 men (18 from the main
group with an initial average level of the threshold load
after the treatment significantly increased the number
of persons who reached submaximal heart rate. The
magnitude of the threshold load in these patients with
4,6±1,6 IU significantly increased to 8.3±1,5 IU (p<0.05).
In 7 patients of the control group from the original cuts
at the end of the course was not. The average threshold
power increased to 5.5±1,4 IU (p>0.05).
Thus, after a course of physical therapy in both
groups, an increase of tolerance to physical loads.
However, among patients with baseline low tolerance
(less than 5 IU) a significant increase in threshold
power was observed only after the rehabilitation as we
developed the technique. Rehabilitation according to the
standard technique did not lead to a significant change in
these parameters.
Table 1. Dynamics of indicators of a functional condition of cardiovascular system under the influence
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |