ISSN 2305-9397. Ғылым және білім. 2022. № 3-3 (68)____ _
109
Table 2 – The resistance of winter wheatvarietys against to common bunt in greenhouses,
Almalybak
village, 2021 year
Variety name
The number of
general wheatears
in
pieces
The number of
infected
wheatears in
pieces
The phytopathological assessment of
disease
Level of infection %
Development
1
2
3
4
5
Zhetysu
19
0
0
HR
Alikhan
20
3
15
MS
Daulet
31
15
48
S
Nureke
25
0
0
HR
Sapaly
11
1
9
MR
Raminal
15
0
0
HR
Dinara
60
0
0
HR
Egemen-20
22
0
0
HR
Karasai
43
0
0
HR
Krasnovodopadskaya 210
34
1
3
MR
Reke
51
0
0
HR
Talim
8
0
0
HR
President
35
5
14
MS
Kyzyl Biday
41
0
0
HR
Naz
38
0
0
HR
Egemen
27
0
0
HR
Bogarnaya 56
78
1
1
MR
Almaly
47
3
6
MR
Aliya
63
4
6
MR
Mereke 75
55
1
2
MR
Mereke 70
23
0
0
HR
Manshyk
34
0
0
HR
Zhalyn
97
0
0
HR
Kazakhstanskaya 25
88
0
0
HR
Krasnovodopadskaya 25
(
standard
)
16
13
81
HS
Varieties Sapaly, Almaly, Aliya, Krasnovodopadskaya 210, Bogarnaya 56, Mereke 75
infected with 1-9% of the disease were found to be resistant to severe common bunt. We can say that
Alikhan and President varieties have an MS response to the disease and are weakly nonresistant, the
incidence was 14-15%. During the phytopathological assessment of common bunt the 15 out of 31
wheatears of infected Daulet varieties were
medium soft against to disease, the incidence of the
disease was 48%. Krasnovodopadskaya 25 variety is highly soft against to the pathogen
Tilletia caries
(DC.) Tul, the incidence rate is 81%(Figure 3).
Figure 2 – The resistant and non-resistant groups
of winter wheat varieties to Tilletia caries (DC.) Tul.
Population
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: