707
“Young Scientist” . # 23 (313) . June 2020
Philology, linguistics
Philology, linguistics
T
he problem of lexical-semantic field is put theoretical
researches of fundamental linguistic concepts. This problem
it is in the river-bed of major researches, because lexico-semantic
the field is totality of lexemes designating the defined notion
in wide sense of this word — on modern presentations of
philologistsplugs in the composition of word of different parts
of speech; with assumption.
Including phraseological units
and lexical materials of
different forms of existence national language, not only literary
but also common speech, dialects, jargons, with an address to
historical lexical materials at orientations on diachronic research.
Lexico-semantic field characterized by the row of signs of
the system as in a synchronous plan (semantic correlativeness
of lexemes, “dividing” the field between itself, presence of
hyponyms and heteronyms), so in a genetic-diachronic plan. [1]
Aim of this article — to analyse and creatively generalize
existent points of view on the lexico-semantic field. The lexical
level of language is organized by difficult correlations lexico-
emantic fields of both contiguous and intersecting.
Compare the fields “knowledge”, “study”, “benefit”,
“inlightening”, “mind”, “progress”, “elimination”, “creation”.
Lexico-semantic field — a concept is very capacious. In him
the main problems of lexicology cross are problems of synonyms,
antonymies, polysemies, problem of correlation of word and
concept.
Decision tasks related to the semantic fields in a vocabulary,
allows newly to light up enumerated. [2]
The concept of the semantic
field got large distribution,
number concrete researches grows constantly, in a theory the
fields are brought in additions and clarifications. The field
theory all anymore contacts with certain by the classification
system of dictionary composition that is dismembered on well-
organized on attitude toward each other large and small groups.
The concept of the semantic field (S. F) behaves to the basic
concepts modern lexical semantics.
This determination concentrates in to itself main problems
of lexical semantics and determines their consideration with
positions of approach of the systems. There are different types
of relation at description of the field interword analysed not
isolated, and in the general system all lexico-semantic. By the
major component component of the lexico-semantic field there
are lexico-semantic groups of words. It is possible to suppose
that areas of the semantic fields
are lexico-semantic groups
(LSG), then there is the semantic field is a family concept in
relation to LSG. L. M. Vasilyev considers that by a “term lexico-
semantic group it is possible to designate any semantic class
of the words (lexemes) incorporated even one general lexical
paradigm семой or even one general by a semantic multiplier”
[3]
With the meaning of age in the Russian language form a
lexical-semantic field age, which can be considered in various
aspects, e. g., formal, functional, semantic. Word meaning age
undergoing constant development and changes in language.The
result of semantic development of words with the designation of
ages is the existence in
the language of their direct, portable and
symbolic values, which are widely used by philosophers, writers
and poets in various types of artistic creativity. An important
role plays selection of words with the designation of age and
use, as the functioning of words denoting age, in the work
reflects the uniqueness of the style of the author, his creative
individuality and uniqueness of vision of the world, therefore
the study of age-related vision of the world of writers is of great
interest. Semantic field is the most voluminous onomasiological
and semantic grouping of words. A semantic field represents
the hierarchical organization of words, which are United by
one generic value and is in the
language a certain semantic
field. Onomasiologische property of the semantic field is that
at its core is a generic seme, or hypersemia, which denotes a
class of objects.
Semasiologically the characteristic of the field is that the
members of the field relate to each other by integral-differential
characteristics in their values that allows them, according to
E. I. Dibrova, to unite and to distinguish between within the
same fields. [4, 11]
The actual semantic structure of the field includes the
following parts:
1) core field represented by the family of SEMA, or
hypersemia.
Hypersemia field is the semantic
component of a higher
order, which organizes itself around the deployment of semantic
fields;
2) the midfield is composed of units with integrated common
core and adjacent units value;
3) periphery includes units, the most remote of its value
from the kernel, a common generic concept here pushed
into the category of potential or probabilistic semantics. The
peripheral units can have a contextual value if the field is built
on a particular text of a work. Usually the peripheral field units
come in contact with other semantic fields, forming a lexical-
semantic continuity of the language system. Most fully the
properties of lexical-semantic fields are considered I. I. Chumak:
1. The semantic field is formed by the set of values that
have
at least one common component, a common semantic
feature. This component, usually expressed as argillaceous, or
giperglikemii, in essence, represents the lexeme with the most
generalized value.
2. In the lexico-semantic field is highlighted in the
microfield — semantic associations, the members of which
are connected integral sign, we Express usually the dominant
feature of microfield, or nuclear lexeme. The external structure
of the microfield
is the core and a few areas, some of which may
be located in close proximity to the nucleus (near periphery),
and others on the periphery of the microfield (far periphery).
3. The internal structure of the field is understood as a set of
correlations linking semantic units.
4. For the field characteristic vzaimozavisimost elements,
acting sometimes in the form of the interchangeability of these
elements.
5. Lexical-semantic fields are not isolated from each other.
Every word of the language included in a particular lexico-