Norway has not previously
had a proper cadastral system, relying
instead on old tax records, only partially supported by maps. The
country has, however, decided to establish an automated system pro-
viding data on land units, addresses and buildings. Its main purpose is
to provide information, not to serve as
a legal basis for taxation, land
registration, etc.
Spain and Italy were also influenced by the Napoleonic cadastre,
and adopted basically similar systems. However, they were only par-
tially developed, and the Spanish system especially does not provide
comprehensive, national coverage. The link between cadastre and land
registration is weak. The two records are administered by different au-
thorities, and the descriptions of the land
in the land register do not
always refer to the cadastral units. The link between cadastre and reg-
ister is, therefore, not primarily the parcel designation, but rather the
name of the owner. This is, of course, an obstacle to further integra-
tion.
The fiscal nature of the cadastres is more predominant in Southern
than in Western Europe. As buildings are
important objects for taxa-
tion, Italy has established a modern building register as a part of the
cadastre.
Greece does not have a comprehensive, homogeneous, national ca-
dastre, but the problem has been studied, and a governmental decision
to establish a nationwide system appears forthcoming.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: