Республикасы Оқу-ағарту министрлігі



бет75/86
Дата16.04.2024
өлшемі0.79 Mb.
#498787
1   ...   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   ...   86
32 Сыныптар бойынша жазба жұмыстарын жүргізуге қойылатын талаптар

Criteria for evaluating an article in grade 11

Mar k / Crite rion

Content (relevance and development of ideas)

Organization (cohesion, paragraphing, and format)

Vocabulary (style andaccuracy)

Grammar (style and accuracy) and Punctuation
(accuracy)

6

consistent and intentional misuse of
register* may
indicate a writer’spersonal style.

  • All content points are fully

addressed and

  • Uses a wide range of advanced connectors accurately; referencing is mostly clear.

  • Uses paragraphs to separate ideas; all paragraphs revolve around one idea or a set of like ideas; the size of each paragraph allows for a proper and balanced development of ideas.

    • The format is appropriate

  • Uses a range of advanced vocabulary appropriately; uses less common lexical items with occasional in appropriacies.

  • Has good control of word formation; may make occasional errors in producing less common word forms.

  • Spells common vocabulary items correctly; very few (one or two) occasional spellingmistakes may be present.

  • May occasionally misspell less common

  • Writes simple and compound sentence forms correctly and demonstrates variety in

length and complexity.

  • Uses complex sentences accurately,

  • Rare errors in grammar and/or punctuation




developed in a balanced way.
*Such misuse of register should not harm the format of
writing.




lexical items.

  • Errors in word choice and/or spelling do not distort meaning.




5

  • All content is relevant to the task; insignificant content omissions may be present.

  • The register on the whole corresponds to the requirements of the task;

occasional and inconsistent misuse of register may be present.
Most content points are addressed,but their

    • development may be slightly imbalanced.

  • Uses a range of basic connectors accurately and attempts to use more advanced connectors, but not always accurately, and referencing, but not always clearly or appropriately.

  • Uses paragraphs to separate ideas; most paragraphs revolve around one idea or a set of like ideas; the size of each paragraph may reflect imbalanced development ofideas.

  • The format is appropriate.

  • Uses a range of everyday vocabulary appropriately; uses less common lexical items, but may make frequent errors.

  • Has good control of word formation; may make errors in producing less common word forms.

Spells common vocabulary items correctly; few (no more than five) occasional spellingmistakes may be present.

  • May often misspell less

common lexical items.

    • Errors in word choice and/or spelling do not distort meaning.

  • Writes simple and compound sentence forms correctly, but

does not
demonstrate variety in length.

  • Occasional errors in

grammar and/or punctuation do not distort meaning.

4

task; insignificant content omissions may be present.

  • The register on the whole corresponds to the requirements of the task.

  • Most content

points are addressed, but
some content points may be

  • Uses a range of basic

connectors accurately.

  • Uses paragraphs to separate ideas, but tends to misuse paragraphing (a script is a set of very short

paragraphs or some paragraphs may be much longer than other ones for no apparent reason).

  • The format is generally appropriate.

  • Uses everyday vocabulary

generally appropriately, while occasionally overusing certain lexical items.

  • Has good control of word formation; can produce common word forms correctly.

  • May make infrequent errors in spelling more difficult words.

  • Errors in word choice and/or spelling rarely distort meaning.

compound sentence forms correctly.

  • While errors in grammar and/or punctuation are noticeable, meaning is rarely distorted.




more fully
covered than others.










3

  • Some content is relevant to the

task; significant content omissions may be present.

  • The

register barely
corresponds to the requirements of the task.

  • Only some content points, which are minimally

addressed.

  • Uses some basic connectors,

but these may be inaccurate or repetitive.

  • Writes in

paragraphs, but may not use them to separate ideas (a script may have random breaks between paragraphs).

  • The format may be inappropriate in places.

  • Uses basic vocabulary reasonably appropriately.

  • Has some control of word formation; can produce some common word forms correctly.

  • Makes frequent errors in spelling more difficult words, but simple words are spelled correctly.

  • Errors in word choice and/orspelling distort meaning at times.

  • Writes simple sentence forms mostly correctly.

  • Errors in grammar and/or punctuation may distort meaning at times.

2

  • Severe irrelevances and misinterpretatio ns of the task may be present.

    • Only few content points, which are minimally addressed.

  • May use a very limited rangeof basic cohesive devices, and those used may not indicate alogical relationship between ideas.

  • Attempts to write in paragraphs, but their use may be confusing (may start every sentence with a new line).

The format may be inappropriate.

  • Uses an extremely limitedrange of vocabulary.

  • Has very limited control of word formation; can produce a few common word forms

correctly.

  • Makes many errors in spelling, including a range of simplewords.

  • Errors in word choice and/orspelling distort meaning.

  • Writes some simple sentence forms correctly.

  • Frequent errorsin grammarand/

1

largely misinterpreted and the response is barely relevant tothe task.

  • Links are missing or incorrect.

  • Does not write in paragraphs at all (a script is a block of text).

    • The format is not appropriate.

  • Can only use a few isolated

words and/or memorized phrases.

  • Has essentially no control of word formation; can barely produce any word forms.

  • Displays few examples ofconventional spelling.

  • No evidence of sentence forms.

0

  • Does not attempt the task in any way. OR

  • The response is completely irrelevant to the task. OR 16

  • There is too little language to assess. OR

Content is completely incomprehensible due to extremely poor handwriting: very few words are distinguishable, so there is a lack of context to verify meaning.



Criteria for evaluating formal letters/introductions in grade 11




Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   ...   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   ...   86




©dereksiz.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет