USES OF VARIOUS DOSAGES OF THE PREPARATION S.F.Sukhanova, A.G.Mahalov
«Kurgan state agricultural academy of T.S.Maltseva», city Kurgan
Poultry farming of Russia is unique branch in agriculture which could treble practically in short terms volumes of output [5].
The further increase in manufacture poultry farming production is possible thanks to an effective utilisation of forages, optimum, biologically well-founded food of a bird [4], and in particular geese that becomes possible at the expense of use of various forages and fodder additives [1], including fermental preparations.
During the last years in a compounding of mixed fodders it was sharply reduced from corn, and the share of barley, an oats, a rye, peas, bran and millet has increased. Inclusion of these raw materials considerably raises the maintenance in mixed fodder difficultly hydrolyzed the substances reducing power nutritiousness of a forage, availability of the amino acids breaking processes of digestion and as consequence of leading decrease of efficiency of a bird. As shows domestic and world experiment, to raise power and nutritional value of mixed fodders with the raised maintenance of grain of cereals it is possible at the expense of fermental preparations. Their use is positively reflected in manufacture of eggs and fowl at the expense of improvement of digestion and use of nutrients of cheap mixed fodders [2, 3].
Therefore represents a certain urgency introduction of fermental preparations to structure of mixed fodders for gooses.
Scientifically-economic experience has been spent in the conditions of Open Company «Katajsky gooses a complex» branch "Vargashinsky" on 5672 gooses of the Italian white breed (age of gooses 4 years) which have distributed in three groups by a principle of analogues. The bird of control group received the basic diet, and skilled with addition to the basic diet of a preparation «Natufos 10000» in number of 0,005 % (1 skilled) and 0,01 % (2 skilled). Feeding of geese spent taking into account norms all-Russia research and design-institute of technology poultry farming (2003).
Studying of productive qualities of a bird is of great importance for working out of scientifically well-founded methods of feeding and the maintenance of a bird, for increase of biological value of eggs, improvement of their incubatory qualities and profitability of poultry-farming economy [6].
It is established that safety of gooses in control group was less in comparison with skilled on 0,36 and 0,14 %. Total gathering of eggs minimum (73,49 thousand eggs) in the control, and in comparison with skilled groups is less on 2,69 and 0,52 %. Egg efficiency on an initial layer was more in 1 skilled group in comparison with control on 1,62 pieces, or 4,21 %, with 2 skilled - on 0,94 pieces, or 2,45 %. Egg efficiency on an average layer in control group is less in comparison with skilled – on 4,03 and 2,38 %.
Hence, the best productive qualities characterized the gooses consuming as a part of mixed fodder a fermental preparation of Natufos 10000 in dosage of 0,005 %, and the gooses consuming the given preparation in a dose of 0,01 % considerably surpassed analogues from control group in egg efficiency.
The estimation of quality of incubatory eggs allows to judge a physiological condition of parental herd, conditions of feeding and the maintenance of a bird. Quality assurance of eggs includes not only their visual estimation on appearance and at contents viewing through light, but also the selective control of test from party of eggs on morphological indicators.
In the table results of a complex estimation of quality of the incubatory eggs received from gooses of experimental groups are resulted.
The estimation of eggs on weight can form a basis for forecasting of a conclusion and quality of young growth. The weight of the eggs received from gooses of control group was less, in comparison with 1 skilled on 4,87 g, or 2,89 %, and with 2 skilled – on 3,77 g, or 2,24 %. The density of the eggs received from gooses of control group, was on 0,09 % less, in comparison with 1 skilled, but identical with 2 skilled. The volume of eggs from gooses of control group was less in comparison with 1 skilled on 4,35 sm3, or 2,83 %, and with 2 skilled – on 3,42 sm3, or 2,23 %.
The table - Results of a morphological estimation of eggs ()
Indicator
|
Group
|
control
|
1 skilled
|
2 skilled
|
Weight of egg, г
|
168,24 ± 3,96
|
173,11 ± 3,71
|
172,01 ± 3,90
|
Egg density, g/sm3
|
1,095 ± 0,001
|
1,096 ± 0,001
|
1,095 ± 0,003
|
Egg volume, sm 3
|
153,61 ± 3,54
|
157,96 ± 3,30
|
157,03 ± 3,71
|
The big diameter of egg, mm
|
928,37 ± 5,88
|
940,55 ± 9,06
|
935,45 ± 6,04
|
Small diameter of egg, mm
|
617,76 ± 8,57
|
640,12 ± 11,02
|
638,00 ± 8,38
|
Index of the form of egg, %
|
66,54 ± 0,73
|
68,05 ± 0,75
|
68,19 ± 0,48
|
Thickness of a shell, mm
|
0,50 ± 0,01
|
0,54 ± 0,01*
|
0,52 ± 0,01
|
Fiber height, mm
|
3,48 ± 0,09
|
3,61 ± 0,07
|
3,59 ± 0,06
|
Unit of Hau
|
80,25 ± 7,76
|
80,97 ± 7,75
|
80,84 ± 5,97
|
The maintenance
in a carotin yolk, mkg/g
|
16,20 ± 0,58
|
16,40 ± 0,51
|
16,40 ± 0,40
|
Weight and parity of components of eggs
|
Yolk:
|
|
|
|
g
|
58,75 ± 1,09
|
60,32 ± 1,02
|
59,89 ± 1,01
|
%
|
34,92
|
34,84
|
34,82
|
Fiber:
|
|
|
|
g
|
86,88 ± 2,68
|
88,99 ± 2,57
|
88,82 ± 2,69
|
%
|
51,64
|
51,41
|
51,63
|
Shell:
|
|
|
|
g
|
22,61 ± 0,32
|
23,81 ± 0,29*
|
23,30 ± 0,30
|
%
|
13,44
|
13,75
|
13,55
|
The relation of weight of fiber
to weight of a yolk
|
1,48 ± 0,02
|
1,47 ± 0,02
|
1,48 ± 0,03
|
*P<0,05
It is established that the big diameter at eggs skilled groups was more than at control on 1,31 and 0,76 %, and small diameter on 3,62 and 3,28 % accordingly. The index of the form of eggs from an experimental bird corresponded to the requirements shown to quality of incubatory goose eggs (63 – 70 %), however in the control are less, than at skilled on 1,51 and 1,65 %. Experience has shown that the thickness of a shell of eggs from gooses 1 and 2 skilled groups was more than in control on 8,00 (P <0,05) and 4,00 % accordingly.
Objective estimation of quality of fiber is measurement of height of a dense bed of fiber and calculation of units of Hau. The height of fiber of the eggs received from gooses of control group was less, than in 1 skilled on 0,13 mm, or 3,74 %, on comparison with 2 skilled – on 0,11 mm, or 3,16 %.
Unit of Hau of eggs from control group was less in comparison with 1 skilled on 0,72, with 2 skilled – on 0,59. The received result specifies that at investigated eggs skilled fiber height more than in control and the size of unit of Hau is more than group in 1 skilled group where the best results on deductibility of young growth have been received. Under the carotin maintenance in a yolk, eggs from gooses of control group conceded skilled on 1,23 %, but corresponded to minimal requirements.
At studying of weight and a parity of components of egg was you-is shown that more yolk contained eggs from gooses of 1 skilled group on 1,57 g, or 2,67 % in comparison with the control, and at 2 skilled on 1,14 g, or 1,94 %. The least maintenance of fiber (86,88) is noticed in eggs of control group that in comparison with 1 skilled it is less on 2,11 g, or 2,43 %, with 2 skilled – on 1,94 г, or 2,23 %. The weight of a shell of eggs a group game-trolnoj was less, than in 1 skilled on 1,20 g, or 5,31 % (P <0,05), with 2 skilled – on 0,69 g, or 3,05 %. Under the relation of weight of fiber to weight of a yolk of egg of gooses control and 2 skilled groups were identical, but more than in 1 skilled on 0,01 units.
On a parity of components of egg the following is established: in percentage expression from an egg lump in the yolk and fiber control contained a little more than in skilled, however 1 skilled group surpassed in the maintenance of a shell control on 0,31 %, and 2 skilled – on 0,11 %.
Thus, the complex estimation of incubatory eggs has shown that the eggs received from gooses of consuming 0,005 % of a preparation of Natufos 10000, were characterised by higher indicators of quality, and a goose the greatest efficiency.
The list of the used literature
1. Egorov, I. Kormlenie of geese /I.Egorov //Poultry farming. – 2007. - № 9. – with. 13 – 17.
2. Lenkova, T. Multizimy in mixed fodders for broilers /T.Lenkova //Poultry farming. – 2007. - № 2. – with. 15.
3. Okolelova, T.M. Actual of a problem of application of biologically active substances and manufacture премиксов /T.M.Okolelova [etc.] – Sergiev Posad, 2002. – 282 with.
4. Petrash, M.G. Ptitsevodstvo of Russia. History. The basic directions. Development prospects / M.G.Petrash [etc.]. – М: the Colossus, 2004. – 297 with.
5. Poultry farming has given meat more than two branches together taken //Animal industries of Russia. – 2007. – № 2. – with. 2 - 4.
6. Smetnev, S.I. Poultry farming /S.I.Smetnev. – М: the Ear, 1970. – 416 with.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |