Resources
Beginning the lesson
5 minutes
|
Ex.3 p.76
11.5.2- use a wide range of vocabulary, which is appropriate to topic and genre, and which is spelt accurately;
Aim: to consolidate vocabulary from the module
• Explain the task.
• Ss complete the task.
• Check Ss’ answers.
|
Answer Key
1 sanitised 2 tailored 3 invested 4 decoded 5 bent 6 sought 7 embodied 8 obscured 9 achieved 10 imported
|
Feedback:
“The praise” method
“Good job!
Well done!”
|
Whiteboard
PPT (With words)
Pupils Book
|
|
Ex.4 A p.76
Aim: to practise adjective complements and transitive & intransitive verb
complementation patterns
• Explain the task.
• Ss complete the task.
• Check Ss’ answers.
|
Answer Key 1 d 2 e 3 b 4 a 5 c
|
Feedback:
“The praise” method
“Good job!
Well done!”
|
Whiteboard
PPT (With words)
Pupils Book
|
|
Ex.4 B p.76
Aim: to practise adjective complements and transitive & intransitive verb complementation patterns
• Explain the task.
• Ss complete the task.
• Check Ss’ answers.
|
Answer Key A 2 B 3 C 5 D 1 E 4
|
Feedback:
“The praise” method
“Good job!
Well done!”
|
Whiteboard
PPT (With words)
Pupils Book
|
|
Ex.5 p.76
11.6.1- use a variety of pre- and post- modifying noun structures on a wide range of general and curricular topics;
Aim: to practise pre-modifying and post-modifying noun structures
• Explain the task.
• Ss complete the task.
• Check Ss’ answers.
|
Answer Key
pre-modifying: five-minute break, university lab, rogramming course
post-modifying: spectrometer which is linked to a tablet, tablet with pre-installed apps
|
Feedback:
“The praise” method
“Good job!
Well done!”
|
Whiteboard
PPT (With words)
Pupils Book
|
Ending the lesson
15 minutes
|
Writing
Ex.6 p.76
Aim: to write a letter to the editor
• Explain the task and give Ss time to plan and complete their work using the prompts and then check Ss’ answers. You can write the points discussed in the Suggested Answer Key
on the whiteboard to help Ss.
• Assign the task as HW and check Ss’ answers in the next lesson.
|
Suggested Answer Key
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing in response to the article about face-to-face job interviews you recently published on your news website. I am totally opposed to the main points raised in the article.
Firstly, interviews allow the person to be screened properly. For example, in an online interview a person can give false information about age, gender or race. In a face-to-face interview it is not possible to lie about these things.
Secondly, conventional interviews allow employers to read non-verbal communication. For instance, the interviewer can read the applicant’s body language and their level of nthusiasm for the position more easily when the applicant is sitting opposite them.
Finally, the interviewee has a better chance to make a good impression in a face-to-face meeting. I say this because they can expand on any points and use positive gestures and body language to impress the interviewer. This is simply not possible online.
In conclusion, I feel that face-to-face interviews are highly effective as they screen candidates, show body language and allow candidates to make a good impression. I hope to see other readers’ opinions on the topic.
Yours faithfully,
John Smith
|
|
