Учебно-методическое пособие для студентов факультетов иностранных языков Балашов 2007 Англ я73 ббк 803(075. 8) К12

5

William F. Buckley, Jr

Up from Misery

Kenneth (we’ll call him) is a cocky feller, something of a sport, tough-talking, an ace in his individualistic profession, who remembers getting drunk at college in the late ‘20’s on the night he won an important boxing match, but at no other time during his college career. Emerging from college into the professional world, he revved up slowly, hitting in his late 30’s his cruising speed: two or three martinis per day. These he was dearly attached to, but not apparently dominated by: He would not, gladly, go a day without his martinis, but neither, after the third, did he require a fourth.

Then in the spring of 1972 his gentle, devoted (teetotaling) wife had a mastectomy, the prognosis optimistic; but with a shade of uncertainty. So, to beef up his morale, he increased the dosage just a little. When, later that year, the doctor called to tell him the worst, he walked straightaway to the nearest bar. After she died, he began buying a fifth each of bourbon and gin on Saturdays, a week’s supply to eke out the several martinis he had been drinking at and after lunch. Fascinated, he watched himself casually making minor alterations: «Make that quarts» was the modest beginning. Then the resupplying would come on Friday; then Thursday. In due course it was a quart a day.

In the morning he would begin; one, then up to five snorts before leaving for the office — later and later in the morning. Before reaching the door he would rinse out his mouth. But always — this fascinated him, as gradually he comprehended the totality of his servitude — he would, on turning the door handle, go back: for just one more.

At night he would prepare himself dinner, then lie down for a little nap, wake hours later, go to the kitchen to eat dinner — only to find he had already eaten it. Once he returned to a restaurant three hours after having eaten his dinner: he forgot he had been there. Blackouts, he called the experiences.

On the crucial day it was nothing special. He walked home from the office, full of gin, and vomited in the street (this often happened), struggling to do this with aplomb in the posh backdrop of the East 60’s. On reaching his apartment he lurched gratefully for the bottle, sipped from the glass... and was clapped by the hand of Providence as unmistakably as any piece of breast was ever struck by a lance.

He heard his own voice say, as if directed by an outside force, «What the hell am I doing to myself?» He poured his martini into the sink, emptied the gin bottle, then emptied the bourbon bottle, then went to the telephone and, never in his life having given a second’s conscious thought to the organization, fumbled through the directory and dialed the number for Alcoholics Anonymous.

One must suppose that whoever answered that telephone call was as surprised as a fireman excitedly advised that a house was ablaze. Kenneth would like to... inquire — but perhaps A A was too busy tonight, perhaps next week sometime?... What? Come today? How about tomorrow? Do you have a meeting every week? You have 800 meetings in New York a week?.. Scores every night?... Okay. Tomorrow.

Tomorrow would be the first of 250 meetings in ninety days with Alcoholics Anonymous. AA advises at least ninety meetings in the first ninety days. Kenneth had assumed he would be mixing with hoi polloi. Always objective, he advises now that «on a scale of 1—10» — incorporating intelligence, education, success, articulateness — «I would rank around six or seven». He made friends. And he made instant progress during those first weeks, quickly losing the compulsion for the morning drinks. But for the late afternoon martinis he thirsted, and he hungered, and he lusted. He dove into a despair mitigated only by his thrice-daily contacts with AA. His banked-up grief for his wife raged now, and every moment, every long afternoon and evening without her, and without alcohol, were endless bouts with the haunting question: What is the point in living at all?

And then, suddenly, as suddenly as on the day he poured the booze into the sink. Twenty-seven weeks later, he had been inveigled into going to a party. Intending to stay one dutiful hour, he stayed five. On returning, he was exhilarated. He had developed anew the capacity to talk with people, other than in the prescribed ritualisms of his profession, or in the boozy idiom of the tippler. He was so excited, so pleased, so elated, he could not sleep until early morning for pleasure at re-experiencing life.

That was two months ago, and every day he rejoiced at his liberation, and prays that others who suffer will find the hand of Alcoholics Anonymous. And — one might presumptuously add — the hand of the Prime Mover, Who was there in that little kitchen on the day the impulse came to him; and Who, surely, is the wellspring of the faith of Alcoholics Anonymous, as of so many other spirits united to help their fellow man.

Joseph Epstein

The Virtues of Ambition

Surely ambition is behind dreams of glory, of wealth, of love, of distinction, of accomplishment, of pleasure, of goodness. What life does with our dreams and expectations cannot, of course, be predicted. Some dreams, begun in selflessness, end in rancor; other dreams, begun in selfishness, end in large-heartedness. The unpredictability of the outcome of dreams is no reason to cease dreaming.

To be sure, ambition, the sheer thing unalloyed by some larger purpose than merely clambering up, is never a pretty prospect to ponder. As drunks have done to alcohol, the single-minded have done to ambition — given it a bad name. Like a taste for alcohol, too, ambition does not always allow for easy satiation. Some people cannot handle it; it has brought grief to others, and not merely the ambitious alone. Still, none of this seems sufficient cause for driving ambition under the counter.

What is the worst that can be said — that has been said — about ambition? Here is a (surely) partial list:

To begin with, it, ambition, is often antisocial, and indeed is now out-moded, belonging to an age when individualism was more valued and useful than it is today. The person strongly imbued with ambition ignores the collectivity; socially detached, he is on his own and out for his own. Individuality and ambition are firmly linked. The ambitious individual, far from identifying himself and his fortunes with the group, wishes to rise above it. The ambitious man or woman sees the world as a battle; rivalrousness is his or her principal emotion: the world has limited prizes to offer, and he or she is determined to get his or hers. Ambition is, moreover, Jesuitical; it can argue those possessed by it into believing that what they want for themselves is good for everyone — that the satisfaction of their own desires is best for the commonweal. The truly ambitious believe that it is a dog-eat-dog world, and they are distinguished by wanting to be the dogs that do the eating.

From here it is but a short hop to believe that those who have achieved the common goals of ambition — money, fame, power — have achieved them through corruption of a greater or lesser degree, mostly a greater. Thus all politicians in high places, thought to be ambitious, are understood to be, ipso facto, without moral scruples. How could they have such scruples — a weighty burden in a high climb — and still have risen as they have?

If ambition is to be well regarded, the rewards of ambition — wealth, distinction, control over one’s destiny — must be deemed worthy of the sacrifices made on ambition’s behalf. If the tradition of ambition is to have vitality, it must be widely shared; and it especially must be esteemed by people who are themselves admired, the educated not least among them. The educated not least because, nowadays more than ever before, it is they who have usurped the platforms of public discussion and wield the power of the spoken and written word in newspapers, in magazines, on television. In an odd way, it is the educated who have claimed to have given up on ambition as an ideal. What is odd is that they have perhaps most benefited from ambition — if not always their own then that of their parents and grandparents. There is a heavy note of hypocrisy in this; a case of closing the barn door after the horses have escaped — with me educated themselves astride them.

Certainly people do not seem less interested in success and its accoutrements now than formerly. Summer homes, European travel, BMWs — the locations, place names and name brands may change, but such items do not seem less in demand today than a decade or two years ago. What has happened is that people cannot own up to their dreams, as easily and openly as once they could, lest they be thought pushing, acquisitive, vulgar. Instead we are treated to fine pjaarisaicalspectacles, which now more than ever seem in ample supply: the revolutionary lawyer quartered in the $250,000 Manhattan condominium; the critic of American materialism with a Southampton summer home; the publisher of radical books who takes his meals in three-star restaurants; the journalist advocating participatory democracy in all phases of life, whose own children are enrolled in private schools. For such people and many more perhaps not so egregious, the proper formulation is, «Succeed at all costs but refrain from appearing ambitious».

The attacks on ambition are many and come from various angles; its public defenders are few and unimpressive, where they are not extremely unattractive. As a result, the support for ambition as a healthy impulse, a quality to be admired and inculcated in die young, is probably lower than it has ever been in the United States. This does not mean that ambition is at an end, that people no longer feel its stirrings and promptings, but only that, no longer openly honored, it is less often openly professed. Consequences follow from this, of course, some of which are that ambition is driven underground, or made sly, or perverse. It can also be forced into vulgarity, as witness the blatant pratings of its contemporary promoters. Such, then, is the way things stand: on die left angry critics, on the right obtuse supporters, and in the middle, as usual, the majority of earnest people trying to get on in life.

Many people are naturally distrustful of ambition, feeling that it represents something intractable in human nature. Thus John Dean entitled his book about his involvement in the Watergate affair during the Nixon administration Blind Ambition, as if ambition were to blame for his ignoble actions, and not the constellation of qualities that make up his rather shabby character. Ambition, it must once again be underscored, is morally a two-sided street. Place next to John Dean Andrew Carnegie, who, among other philanthropic acts, bought the library of Lord Acton, at a time when Acton was in financial distress, and assigned its custodianship to Acton, who never was told who his benefactor was. Need much more be said on the subject than that, important though ambition is, there are some things that one must not sacrifice to it?

But going at things the other way, sacrificing ambition so as to guard against its potential excesses, is to go at things wrongly. To discourage ambition is to discourage dreams of grandeur and greatness. All men and women are born, live, suffer, and die; what distinguishes us one from another is our dreams, whether they be dreams about worldly or unworldly things, and what we do to make them come about.

It may seem an exaggeration to say that ambition is the linchpin of society, holding many of its disparate elements together, but it is not an exaggeration by much. Remove ambition and the essential elements of society seem to fly apart. Ambition, as opposed to mere fantasizing about desires, implies work and discipline to achieve goals, personal and social, of a kind society cannot survive without. Ambition is intimately connected with family, for men and women not only work partly for their families; husbands and wives are often ambitious for each other, but harbor some of their most ardent ambitions for their children. Yet to have a family nowadays — with birth control readily available, and inflation a good economic argument against having children — is nearly an expression of ambition in itself. Finally, though ambition was once the domain chiefly of monarchs and aristocrats, it has, in more recent times, increasingly become the domain of the middle classes. Ambition and futurity—a sense of building for tomorrow — are inextricable. Working, saving, planning — these, the daily aspects of ambition — have always been the distinguishing marks of a rising middle class. The attack against ambition is not incidentally an attack on the middle class and what it stands for. Like it or not, the middle class has done much of society’s work in America; and it, the middle class, has from the beginning run on ambition.

It is not difficult to imagine a world shorn of ambition. It would probably be a kinder world: without demands, without abrasions, without disappointments. People would have time for reflection. Such work as they did would not be for themselves but for the collectivity. Competition would never enter in. Conflict would be eliminated, tension become a thing of the past. The stress of creation would be at an end. Art would no longer be troubling, but purely celebratory in its functions. The family would become superfluous as a social unit, with all its former power for bringing about neurosis drained away. Longevity would be increased, for fewer people would die of heart attack or stroke caused by tumultuous endeavor. Anxiety would be extinct. Time would stretch on and on, with ambition long departed from the human heart.

Ah, how unrelievedly boring life would be!

There is a strong view that holds that success is a myth, and ambition therefore a sham. Does this mean that success does not really exist? That achievement is at bottom empty? That the efforts of men and women are of no significance alongside the force of movements and events? Now not all success, obviously, is worth esteeming, nor all ambition worth cultivating. Which are and which are not is something one soon enough learns on one’s own. But even the most cynical secretly admit that success exists; that achievement counts for a great deal; and that the true myth is that the actions of men and women are useless. To believe otherwise is to take on a point of view that is likely to be deranging. It is, in its implications, to remove all motive for competence, interest in attainment, and regard for posterity.

We do not choose to be born. We do not choose our parents. We do not choose our historical epoch, the country of our birth or the immediate circumstances of our upbringing . We do not, most of us, choose to die; nor do we choose the time or conditions of our death. But within all this realm of choicelessness, we do choose how we shall live: courageously or in cowardice, honorably or dishonorably, with purpose or in drift. We decide what is important and what is trivial in life. We decide that what makes us significant is either what we do or what we refuse to do. But no matter how indifferent the universe may be to our choices and decisions, these choices and decisions are ours to make. We decide. We choose. And as we decide and choose, so are our lives formed. In the end, forming our own destiny is what ambition is about.

Exploring Ideas and Questions for Discussion

1. 
   What is the most characteristic sentence pattern for essays (simple or composite in structure, affirmative or interrogative in communicative purpose, short or lengthy sentences)? Why?
   
2. 
   Explain the meaning of the contrast of a simple sentence to a group of lengthy composite sentences. Find examples of such patterns and interptrete them in both essays.
   
3. 
   Find examples of syntactic repetition (parallel constructions) in essays. Expand on their semantic role in expressing the main idea.
   
4. 
   Find examples of intensification synonyms (groups of synonyms with the connotation of intensity in their structure) and comment on their semantic function.
   
5. 
   Find as many as possible emphatic constructions, characterise their types and specify their semantic role in the expression of the author’s idea.
   
6. 
   In what way is the essayist’s idiosyncrasy expressed?
   

Особенности синтаксического ритма эссе

Жанр эссе с трудом поддается определению. Рассуждение на определенную тему — вот, пожалуй, и все, что выражает сущность любого эссе. Но насколько разным может быть это рассуждение — и воспоминания из далекого детства, и попытка классификации какого-либо явления, и просто эмоциональный рассказ о случае из жизни, может быть, с оттенком назидательности. Сегодня этот жанр является довольно популярным, вы можете найти эссе на самые разнообразные темы в любом англоязычном журнале.

Известный американский эссеист Эдвард Хоугленд, рассуждая об истории и отличиях эссе от журнальной и газетной статьи, короткого рассказа, автобиографии, характеризует эссе как разговор человека с человеком, «разговор ума с умом» (mind speaking to mind), в котором особенно ярко проявляется индивидуальность, оригинальность, идиосинкразия (греч. idios (своеобразный) + synkrasis (смешение)) автора (3).

Нашей задачей является попытка выявления лексико-грамматических особенностей литературного жанра эссе. Кажется, что основное его своеобразие заключается в синтаксических особенностях, особом синтаксическом ритме, который, с одной стороны, индивидуален для авторского рассуждения, и, с другой стороны, является характерным для большинства эссе. «Разговор человека с человеком» всегда характеризуется манерой общения. Как же общаются с читателями эссеисты?

Исследование особенностей синтаксиса современного эссе показало, что его тексты изобилуют чертами, специфическими для публичной речи — различными видами эмфатических конструкций, вопросительными предложениями (риторическими вопросами), параллельными конструкциями, многочисленными повторениями. Экспрессивность языка эссе достигается также употреблением сравнительных конструкций, метафор, эпитетов. Использование всех указанных лексико-синтаксических средств направлено на повышение выразительности стиля эссе, на привлечение читательского внимания к точке зрения автора на ту или иную тему.

Так, эссе У. Ф. Томпсона «Why Don’t the Scientists Admit They’re Human?» (4) читается на одном дыхании благодаря множеству вопросов, на которые сам автор весьма выразительно отвечает, и риторических вопросов, на которые ответ не требуется. Не будет преувеличением сказать, что почти каждый абзац эссе содержит вопрос, являющийся его семантическим центром, т.е. выражающий ключевую идею абзаца. Само эссе начинается с вопроса: «Did you ever read a scientific paper that begins, «For no good reason at all I had a hunch that…» or «I was just fooling around one day when…?» No, sir! Далее вопросы следуют один за другим, помогая разворачивать перед читателем образ рассуждения писателя:

…how are we to divine that in a vast majority of moments when he is not writing the scientist is a genial, sensible, rather humble man? (3-й абзац, всего в эссе 21 абзац).

Is it any wonder that in the popular literature the scientist often appears as a hybrid superman-spoiled child? (4)

Dare the local schoolteacher depart from the stereotype imposed by tradition? (6)

Did Fleming report anything that happened according to plan? (7)

What was the mold and how did it kill? (8)

What kept them (planets) in place? Why didn’t they fall out of the sky? (11)

How many men would have considered the possibility of an apple falling up into the tree? (12)

Еще одним приемом автора является применение усилительных конструкций с употреблением вспомогательных глаголов, позволяющих ярче подчеркнуть ту или иную идею. Часто такое усиление комбинируется с изменением обычного места обстоятельства частотности действия — оно выдвигается на первое место в предложении:

Seldom does a trace of anything haphazard, anything human, appear in published reports of research experiments.

This paragraph is far from a literary masterpiece, but it does illustrate a straightforwardness which is infrequently present in scientific writing.

Эссе Томпсона об ученых практически все написано сложными предложениями. На их фоне контрастное употребление серии простых предложений или одного простого предложения служит еще одним синтаксическим фактором выделения авторской мысли. Посмотрим, как это происходит в двенадцатом абзаце эссе:

How many men would have considerded the possibility of an apple falling up into the tree? Newton did because he was not trying to predict anything. He was just wondering. His mind was ready for the unpredictable. Unpredictability is part of the essential nature of research. If you don’t have unpredictable things, you don’t have research. Scientists tend to forget this when writing their cut and dry reports for the technical journals, but history is filled with examples of it.

Употребление параллельных конструкций — еще один вид усиления авторской мысли, они как бы выполняют функцию синонимов, обрисовывая разные грани описываемого явления. У Томпсона параллельно употребляются как придаточные, так и простые предложения:

No, I mean the man who doesn’t conform, who doesn’t always think the way most of us are thinking, who doesn’t always act the way most of us are acting.

This imaginary person does not quite belong to the same species as other human beings; he lives in a different world; he thinks in a different way.

Если у Томпсона синтаксические параллелизмы встречаются лишь изредка, то у Джудит Вьорст в эссе «Friends, Good Friends — and Such Good Friends» они являются ключевыми, могут занимать целые абзацы. Они — главный привлекающий внимание элемент, с одной стороны, а с другой — основное детализирующее, описательное средство (5).

We all have a friend who knew us when… our family lived in that three-room flat in Brooklyn, when our dad was out of work for seven months, when our brother Allie got in that fight where they hah to call the police, when our sister married the endodontist from Yonkers and when, the morning after we lost our virginity, she was the first, the only, we told.

В эссе, занимающем около трех страниц, насчитывается девять параллельных конструкций, большая часть которых растягивается на целый абзац. Некоторые параллелизмы содержат в себе градацию — постепенное увеличение описываемого качества. Как раз такой прием интенсификации содержит в себе один из заключительных абзацев эссе:

We might tell a medium friend, for example, that yesterday we had a fight with our husband. And we might tell a pretty good friend that this fight made us so mad that we slept on the couch. And we might tell a very good friend that the reason we got so mad in that fight that we slept on the couch had something to do with that girl who works in his office.

Еще одной отличительной чертой эссе Джудит Вьорст является повтор первого абзаца в конце эссе. В повторной интерпретации исчезают некоторые детали и комментарии автора, но от этого сама идея эссе вырисовывается четче, чем она была обозначена в начале, как это и должно быть в заключительном абзаце:

The best of friends, I still believe, totally love and support and trust each other, and bare to each other the secrets of their souls, and run — no questions asked — to help each other, and tell harsh truths to each other when they must be told.

Для эссе Вильяма Бакли-младшего «Up from Misery» так же, как и для эссе других авторов, характерна инверсия, но ее тип несколько отличается от уже упомянутых (1). В манере Бакли — выносить в начало предложения обстоятельство времени или цели либо вообще дополнение, тем самым выделяя различные детали повествования.

But always — this fascinated him, as gradually he comprehended the totality of his servitude — he would, on turning the door handle, go back: for just one more.

Blackouts, he called the experiences.

Обратим внимание на то, как Бакли умело сочетает в одном предложении инверсию и параллельные конструкции с синонимичными глаголами, расположенными в порядке возрастания их воздействия на читателя — каждый из глаголов семантически более сильный, чем предыдущий:

But for the late afternoon martinis he thirsted, and he hungered, and he lusted.

Еще более удачным примером интенсифицирующего параллелизма является предложение с параллельными предикативами, описывающее радость главного героя эссе, сумевшего освободиться от алкогольной зависимости:

He was so excited, so pleased, so elated, he could not sleep until early morning for pleasure of re-experiencing life.

Итак, здесь перечислены основные формы эмфатических средств, характерных для стиля эссе. Интересно, что произведение каждого писателя отличается своими особенностями, своими «любимыми» эмфатическими конструкциями и элементами, но в целом для всех эссе характерен определенный набор эмфатических «штучек», делающих их такими живыми, убедительными, завораживающими при чтении. Поистине потрясающим по силе воздействия выглядит заключительный абзац эссе Джозефа Эпстейна «TheVirtues of Ambition», сочетающий в себе чередование хлестких по силе своих выводов простых предложений и долгих, рассудительных, детализирующих сложных предложений, несколько верениц параллельных конструкций, сеть антонимических противопоставлений, несколько разновидностей инверсии (2):

We do not choose to be born. We do not choose our parents. We do not choose our historical epoch, the country of our birth or the immediate circumstances of our upbringing. We do not, most of us, choose to die; nor do we choose the time or conditions of our death. But within all this realm of choicelessness, we do choose how we shall live: courageously or in cowardice, honorably or dishonorably, with purpose or in drift. We decide what is important and what is trivial in life. We decide that what makes us significant is either what we do or what we refuse to do. But no matter how indifferent the universe may be to our choices and decisions, these choices and decisions are ours to make. We decide. We choose. And as we decide and choose, so are our lives formed. In the end, forming our own destiny is what ambition is about.

Список литературы

1. Buckley, William E. Up to Misery / W. E. Buckley // Mind Speaks to Mind. Selected American Essay for Advanced Students of English as a Foreign language / United States Information Agency. — Washington : D. C., 1994. — P. 7—8.

2. Epstein, Joseph. The Virtues of Ambition / J. Epstein. Ibid. — P. 16—19.

3. Hoagland, Edward. On Essays / E. Hoagland. Ibid. — P. 26—27.

4. 
   Thompson, W. Furness. Why Don’t Scientists Admit They’re Human? / W. F. Thompson. Ibid. — P. 35—37.
   
5. 
   Viorst, Judith. Friends, Good Friends and Such Good Friends / J. Viorst. Ibid. — P. 73—76.
   

жүктеу/скачать 477 Kb.

Достарыңызбен бөлісу: