Лингвистический взгляд на политическую концептологию: россия в парламентском дискурсе современной франции



жүктеу/скачать 182.5 Kb.
бет7/9
Дата12.02.2023
өлшемі182.5 Kb.
#469436
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9
Алферов и др

СПИСОК ИЛЛЮСТРАТИВНОГО МАТЕРИАЛА

  1. Assemblée Nationale, 2019. Gaymard H. Available at: URL: http://www.assemblee-nationale. fr /14/cr-cafe/14-15/c1415079.asp#P7_246 (accessed: 26.02.2021).

  2. Assemblée Nationale, 2020. Site Internet de l' Assemblée Nationale. Available at: URL: http://videos.assemblee-nationale.fr/ (accessed: 21.06.2021).



REFERENCES

  1. Alferov, A. V., Kurashenko, I. R., Popova, G. E. (2016). The dynamics of Russia’s conceptualization in the parliamentary discourse in contemporary Europe //Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. № 1. S. 117-121.(In Russ.).

  2. Alferov, A. V., Kustova, E. Yu. (2019). Deliberativnyi diskurs kak mekhanizm politicheskoi interaktsii: strategiya issledovaniya [Deliberative discourse as a mechanism of political interaction] // Studia Germanica, Romanica et Comparatistica. T. 15. № 1-2 (43-44). S. 85-92. (In Russ.).

  3. Alferov A. V., Kustova E. Yu. (2020). Ad-hoc kontsepty i frantsuzskaya politicheskaya personologiya [Ad-hoc concepts and French political personology]// Studia Germanica, Romanica et Comparatistica. T. 16. № 4 (50). S. 55-66. (In Russ.).

  4. Zhabotinskaya, S. A. (2009). Kontsept / domen: matrichnaya i setevaya modeli [Concept / domain: the matrix and the network model] // Kul'tura narodov Prichernomor'ya. № 168. T.1. S. 254-259. (In Russ.).

  5. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena. 477 s. (In Russ.).

  6. Kratkii slovar' kognitivnykh terminov (1997) [A concise dictionary of cognitive terms]. / E. S. Kubryakova, V. Z. Dem'yankov i dr. M.: MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. 245 s. (In Russ.).

  7. Kurashenko, I.R. (2018). Obraz Rossii v ramkakh frantsuzskoi prezidentskoi kampanii 2017 g. (na osnove programmnykh dokumentov kandidatov) [Image of russia in french presidential campaign 2017 (based on candidatesʼ program documents)] // Studia Germanica, Romanica et Comparatistica. T. 14. № 4 (42). S. 75-84. (In Russ.).

  8. Makarenko, V. P. (2008). Politicheskaya kontseptologiya: pervye itogi razrabotki [] // Ekonomicheskii vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. T.6. № 2. S. 98-122. (In Russ.).

  9. Neretina, S. S. (2011)/ Kontsepty politicheskoi kul'tury [Concepts of political culture] / S. S. Neretina, A. P. Ogurtsov. M.: IFRAN. 279 s. (In Russ.).

  10. Orlova, O. G. (2013). Stereotipy o Rossii i russkikh v amerikanskom publitsisticheskom diskurse XIX-XXI vekov. Materialy k sostavleniyu slovarya [Stereotypes about Russia and Russians in the American journalistic discourse of the XIX-XXI centuries. Materials for compiling a dictionary] // Vestnik KemGU. № 3 (55). T. 1. S. 185-192. (In Russ.).

  11. Popova, G. E. (2019). Kognitivno-pragmaticheskaya kategoriya relevantnosti v strukture parlamentskoi i politicheskoi kommunikatsii [Cognitive-pragmatic category of relevance in the structure of parliamentary and political communication] // Politicheskaya lingvistika. № 1 (73). S. 81-89. (In Russ.).

  12. Popova, G. E. (2020a.). Kognitivnyi rezonans kak funktsiya interaktsional'nogo entalamirovaniya [Cognitive resonance as a function of interactive entailment] // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. № 3 (42). S. 285-290. (In Russ.).

  13. Popova, G. E. (2020b) Relevantnost' vyskazyvaniya kak uslovie uspeshnosti rechevoi interaktsii [Reporting relevance as a condition of successful speech interaction] // Studia Germanica, Romanica et Comparatistica. T. 16. № 3 (49). S. 75-84. (In Russ.).

  14. Popova, Z. D., Sternin I. A. (2007). Kognitivnaya lingvistika. [Cognitive linguistics]. M. 314 s. (In Russ.).

  15. Posternyak, K. P. (2021) Dinamika verbalizatsii obraza-kontsepta «Rossiya» v britanskom mediadiskurse XX–XXI vv. [Dynamics of the verbalization of the image-concept "Russia" in the British media discourse of the XX-XXI centuries]: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Belgorod. 24 s. (In Russ.).

  16. Prokhorov, Yu. E. (2008). V poiskakh kontsepta. [In search of a concept]. Moskva: Flinta: Nauka. 170 s. (In Russ.).

  17. Rancier, J. Nesoglasie: Politika i filosofiya. [La mésentente: Politique et phylosophie]. SPb.: Machina, 2013. 192 s. (In Russ.).

  18. Chudinov, A. P. (2012). Politicheskaya lingvistika. [Political linguistics]. M.: Flinta: Nauka. 256 s. (In Russ.).

  19. Casasanto D., Lupyan G. (2015). All Concepts are Ad Hoc Concepts // The Conceptual Mind: New directions in the study of concepts. E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.) Cambridge: MIT Press. P. 543-566.

  20. Fauconnier G., Turner M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks // Cognitive science. Vol.22. P. 133-187.

  21. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts. Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA. 192 р.

  22. Foucault, М. (1969). L'Archeologie du savoir / M. Foucault. P.: Gallimard. 288 р.

  23. Gaus, G. Political Concepts And Political Theories. Routledge, 2000. 303 p.

  24. Political concepts (2003). / Bellamy R., Mason A. (Ed.). Manchester/ New York Manchester University Press. 245 p.

  25. Krieg-Planque, A. (2006). Formules et lieux discursifs: propositions pour l'analyse du discours politique // Semen.Revue de sémio-linguistique des textes et discours, Besançon, Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté. № 21. P. 19-47.

  26. Wilson D., Carston R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. // N. Burton–Roberts (Ed.). Advances in Pragmatics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave. P. 230-260.




жүктеу/скачать 182.5 Kb.

Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9



©dereksiz.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз
    Басты бет