Глава 2. Характерные ошибки
1. Kurt C. Strange and Robert L. Ferrer, “The Paradox of Family
Care”, Annals of FamilyMedicine 7, no. 4 (July/August 2009), pp. 293–99, особенно p. 295.
2. Sally Engle
Merry, The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Traf
ficking (Chicago, 2016), pp. 1–33.
3. Ibid., p. 1.
4. Kevin E. Davis, Benedict Kingsbury, and Sally Engle Merry, “Introduction: Global
Governance by Indicators”, in Kevin Davis, Angelina Fisher, Benedict Kingsbury, and Sally Engle
Merry (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification andRankings (New
York, 2012), pp. 9, 18.
Глава 3. Происхождение системы вознаграждения в
зависимости от результативности
1. Цитируется по книге: Matthew Arnold, “The Twice-Revised Code” (1862), in R. H. Super
(ed.), The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1960–77), vol. 2, pp.
214–15.
2. Park Honan, Matthew Arnold: A Life (Cambridge, Mass., 1983), pp. 318–19; R. H.
Super’s notes to Arnold, “The Twice-Revised Code”, in Complete Prose Works, vol. 2, p. 349.
3. Arnold, “The Twice-Revised Сode”, рp. 223–24.
4. Ibid., p. 226.
5. Ibid., p. 243.
6. Fred G.
Walcott, The Origins of Culture and Anarchy: Matthew Arnold and PopularEducation in England (
Toronto, 1970), pp. 7–8.
7. Arnold, “Special Report on Certain Points Connected with Elementary Education in
Germany, Switzerland, and France” (1886), in Complete Prose Works, vol. 11, pp. 1, 28.
8. Simon Patten, “An Economic Measure of School Efficiency”, Educational Review 41
(May 1911), pp. 467–69, цитируется в книге: Raymond E.
Callahan, Education and the Cultof Efficiency (Chicago, 1962), p. 48.
9. Frederick W. Taylor, The Principles of Scientific Management (New York, 1911). О
Тейлоре и его влиянии на сторонников реформы образования см.:
Callahan, Education and the Cult of Efficiency, chap. 2.
10. Alfred D. Chandler,
Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in AmericanBusiness (Cambridge, Mass., 1977),
pp. 275–76.
101
11. Taylor, процитировано в: James C.
Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemesto Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Ne
w Haven, 1998), p. 336.
12. Frederick W. Taylor, Principles of Scientific Management, процитировано в: David
Montgomery, The Fall of the House of Labor (New Haven, 1989), p. 229.
13. Ellwood P. Cubberley, Public School Administration (Boston, 1916), см.:
Callahan, Education and the Cult of Efficiency, pp. 95–99.
14. Dana
Goldstein, The Teacher Wars: A History of America’s Most Embattled Profession(New York,
2014), pp. 86–87.
15. О термине «прогресс учащегося» см.: Chad Aldeman, “The Teacher Evaluation
Revamp, in Hindsight”, EducationNext 17, no. 2 (Spring
2017), http://educationnext.org/the-teacher-evaluation-revamp-in-hindsight-obama-administration-r
eform/.
16. Richard
Sennett, The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work inthe New Capitalism (
New York, 1998), p. 42.
17. Rakesh
Khurana, From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation ofAmerican Business Scho
ols and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession(Princeton, 2007), p. 295.
18. Richard R. Locke and J.-C.
Spender, Confronting Managerialism: How the BusinessElite and Their Schools Threw Our Lives o
ut of Balance (London, 2011), p. xiii.
19. Adrian Wooldridge, Masters of Management (New York, 2011), p. 3.
20. Bob Lutz, Car Guys vs. Bean Counters: The Battle for the Soul of American Business(New
York, 2013).
21. Christopher Pollitt, “Towards a New World: Some Inconvenient Truths for Anglosphere
Public Administration”, International Review of Administrative Sciences 81, no. 1 (2015), pp. 3–17,
особенно pp. 4–5; John Quiggin, “Bad Company:
Correspondence”, Quarterlyessay. com, https://www.quarterlyessay.com.au/correspondence/1203; а
также Henry Mintzberg, “Managing Government, Governing
Management”, Harvard BusinessReview, May–June 1996, pp. 75–83.
22. David Halberstam, The Best and the Brightest (New York, 1972), pp. 213–65.
23. Kenneth Cukier and Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, “The Dictatorship of
Data”, MITTechnology Review, May 31, 2013.
24. Edward N. Luttwak, The Pentagon and the Art of War (New York, 1984), p. 269.
25. Luttwak, The Pentagon and the Art of War, pp. 30–31. О злоупотреблении данными по
потерям см. анализ воспоминаний и научной литературы в: Ben
Connable, Embracing the Fog of War: Assessment and Metrics in Counterinsurgency (Rand
Corporation, 2012), pp. 106ff.
26. Luttwak, The Pentagon and the Art of War, pp. 138–43.
27. Ibid., p. 152.
28. Mаtthew Stewart, The Management Myth: Why the Experts Keep Getting It Wrong(New
York, 2009), p. 31.
29. Theodore M.
Porter, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science andPublic Life (Princeton, 1995), p.
ix.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |