ӘДЕБИЕТТЕР
Apriyani R., Ramalis T.R. & Suwarma I.R., 2019 – Apriyani R., Ramalis T.R. & Suwarma I.R.
Analyzing Student’s Problem Solving Abilities of Direct Current Electricity in STEM-based Learning.
Journal of Science Learning, 2(3): 85–91.
https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i3.17559
. (in Eng.).
Baran M., Karakoyun F. & Maskan A., 2021 – Baran M., Baran M., Karakoyun F. & Maskan
A. The Influence of Project-Based STEM (PjbL-STEM) Applications on the Development of 21st-
Century Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4): 798–815.
https://doi.org/10.36681/
tused.2021.104
. (in Eng.).
Badeleh A., 2021 – Badeleh A. The effects of robotics training on students’ creativity and learning
in physics. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2): 1353–1365.
https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10639-019-09972-6
(in Eng.).
Казбекова Г.Н., Исмагулова Ж.С., 2022 – Казбекова Г.Н., Исмагулова Ж.С. Инновациялық
STEM-білім беру тәсілін қалыптастыру// Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. 3(125): 200–210.
https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-3/2664-0686.17
. (in Kaz.).
Nazifah N. & Asrizal A., 2022 – Nazifah N. & Asrizal A. Development of STEM Integrated
Physics E-Modules to Improve 21st Century Skills of Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4):
2078–2084.
https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1820
. (in Eng.).
Nurramadhani A., 2020 – Nurramadhani A. Analysis of Students’ STEM Literasy Based on
Gender Differences in Science Learning. JHSS (Journal of humanities and social studies), 4(1): 21–
25.
https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v4i1.1903
. (in Eng.).
Ramankulov Sh., Choruh A., Polatuly S., 2022 – STEAM technology as a tool for developing
creativity of students: on the example of a school physics course// Ясауи университетінің
хабаршысы. –4(126): 200–211.
https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-4/2664-0686.17
. (in Eng.).
Susilawati S., Doyan A., Mulyadi L., Abo C.P. & Pineda C.I.S., 2022 – Susilawati S., Doyan A.,
Mulyadi L., Abo C.P. & Pineda C.I.S. The Effectiveness of Modern Physics Learning Tools Using
the PhET Virtual Media Assisted Inquiry Model in Improving Cognitive Learning Outcomes, Science
Process Skills, and Scientific Creativity of Prospective Teacher Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
IPA, 8(1): 291–295.
https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1304
. (in Eng.)
Shute V.J. & Rahimi S., 2021 – Shute V.J. & Rahimi S. Stealth assessment of creativity in a
physics video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106647
.
(in Eng.).
Sulaiman F., Rosales J.J. & Kyung L.J., 2023 – Sulaiman F., Rosales J.J. & Kyung L.J. The
effectiveness of the integrated stem-pbl physics module on students’ interest, sensemaking and
effort. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(1): 113–129.
https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.113
.
(in Eng.).
Saputro V.C.E., Wasis & Prastowo T., 2023 – Saputro V.C.E., Wasis & Prastowo T. The
Effectiveness of STEM-Based Guided Inquiry Learning to Train Science Literacy of Physics. Studies
in Learning and Teaching, 3(3): 141–148.
https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v3i3.179
. (in Eng.).
Sulisworo D., Kaliappen N., History A., Winarti W., Sulisworo D. & Kaliappen N., 2021 –
Sulisworo D., Kaliappen N., History A., Winarti W., Sulisworo D. & Kaliappen N. Evaluation of
STEM-based physics learning on students’ critical thinking skills: a systematic literature review.
Indonesian Review of Physics, 4(2), 23–31. Retrieved from
http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/irip
.
(in Eng.).
Haryadi R. & Pujiastuti H. 2022 – Haryadi R. & Pujiastuti H. Enhancing Pre-service Physics
Teachers’ Higher Order Thinking Skills Through STEM-PjBL Model. International Journal of STEM
Education for Sustainability, 2(2): 156–171.
https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v2i2.38
. (in Eng.).
«Цифрлық Қазақстан» мемлекеттік бағдарламасы. Қазақстан Республикасы Үкіметінің
2017 жылғы 12 желтоқсандағы № 827 қаулысы.
http://adilet.zan.kz
20.04.2023. (in Kaz.).
207
ISSN 1991-346X
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |