Ўзбекистон республикаси олий ва ўрта махсус таълим вазирлиги фарғона давлат университети



Pdf көрінісі
бет28/44
Дата03.06.2022
өлшемі0.64 Mb.
#458959
1   ...   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   ...   44
stilistika va matn tahlili

The Epithet 
From the strongest means of displaying the writer’s or speaker’s emotional attitude 
to his communication, we now pass to a weaker but still forceful means – the epithet. The 
epithet is subtle and delicate in character. It is not so direct as the interjection. Some 
people even consider that it can create an atmosphere of objective evaluation, whereas it 
actually conveys the subjective attitude of the writer, showing that he is partial in one way 
or another. 
The epithet is a stylistic device based on the interplay of emotive and logical 
meaning in an attributive word, phrase or even sentence, used to characterize an object and 
pointing out to the reader, and frequently imposing on him, some of the properties or 
features of the object with the aim of giving an individual perception and evaluation of 
these features or properties. The epithet is markedly subjective and evaluative. The logical 
attribute is purely objective, non-evaluating. It is descriptive and indicates an inherent or 
prominent feature of the thing or phenomenon in question. 


39 
Thus in green meadows, white snow, round table, blue skies, pale complexion, 
lofty mountains and the like, the adjectives are more logical attributes than 
epithets. They indicate those qualities of the objects which may be regarded as 
generally recognized. But in wild wind, loud ocean, remorseless dash of billows, 
formidable waves, heartburning smile, the adjectives do not point to inherent 
qualities of the objects described. They are subjectively evaluative.
The epithet makes a strong impact on the reader, so much so, that the reader 
unwittingly begins to see and evaluate t hings as the writer wants him to. Indeed, in 
such word combinations as destructive charms, glorious sight, encouraging smile
the interrelation between logical and emotive meanings may be said to manifest 
itself in different degrees. The word destructive has retained its logical meaning to 
a considerable extent, but at the same time an experienced reader cannot help 
perceiving the emotive meaning of the word which in this combination will signify 
conquering, irresistible, dangerous. The logical meaning of the word glorious in 
combination with the word sight has almost entirely faded out. Glorious is already 
fixed in dictionaries as a word having an emotive meaning alongside its primary, 
logical meaning. As to the word encouraging (in the combination encouraging 
smile) it is half epithet and half logical attribute. In fact, it is sometimes difficult 
to draw a clear line of demarcation between epithet and logi cal attribute. In some 
passages the logical attribute becomes so strongly enveloped in the emotional 
aspect of the utterance that it begins to radiate emotiveness, though by nature it is 
logically descriptive. Take for example, the adjectives green, white, blue, lofty (but 
somehow not round) in the combinations given above. In a suitable context they 
may all have a definite emotional impact on the reader. This is pro bably explained 
by the fact that the quality most characteristic of the given object is attached to 
it, thus strengthening the quality.
Epithets may be classified from different standpoints: semantic and 
structural. Semantically, epithets may be divided into two groups: those associated 
with the noun following and those unassociated with it.
Associated epithets are those which point to a feature which is essential to 
the objects they describe: the idea expressed in the epithet is to a certain extent 
inherent in the concept of the object. The asso ciated epithet immediately refers the 
mind to the concept in question due to some actual quality of the object it is 
attached to, for instance 'dark foresf, 'dreary midnight", 'careful attention', 
'unwearyingresearch', 'indefatigable assiduity', 'fantastic terrors', etc 
From the point of view of their compositionalstructure epithets may be divided into 
s i m p l e , c o m p o u n d and p h r a se e p i t h e t s . Simple epithets are ordinary 
adjectives. Examples 
have been given above. Compound epithets are built like compound adjectives. 
Examples are: 
'heart-burningsigh', 'sylph-like figures', 'cloud-shapengiant',
".. .curly-headedgood-for-nothing, 
And mischief-making monkey from his birth." (Byron). 
The tendency to cram into one language unit as much information as possible has led to 
new compositional models for epithets which we shall call p h r a s e e p i t h e t s . A 


40 
phrase and even a whole sentence may become an epithet if the main formal requirement 
of the epithet is maintained, viz. its attributive use. But unlike simple and compound 
epithets, which may have pre- or post-position, phrase epithets are always placed 
before the nouns they refer to.


Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   ...   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   ...   44




©dereksiz.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет