Концепция интертекстуальности ю. Кристевой как трансформация теории литературной традиции
J. KRISTEVA’S INTERTEXTUALITY CONCEPT
жүктеу/скачать 0.69 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
- Бұл бет үшін навигация:
- Keywords
| J. KRISTEVA’S INTERTEXTUALITY CONCEPT
AS TRANSFORMATION OF THE LITERARY TRADITION THEORY K.A. Fomin Gorky Institute of Literature and Creative Writing, Moscow blackline@nightmail.ru The current article considers the theories of textual genesis and intertextuality of J. Kristeva as a direct evolution of tradition that was developed in the fi rst half of the XX century. Here tradition is regarded as a particular space of simultaneous coexistence and continuous cooperation among different works of literature. In the course of research the author analyzes the principles of literary work formation and their mutual infl uence as stated in the theory of the French poststructuralist philosopher. The author concludes that Kristeva’s concept represents tradition as a chaotic and dynamic fi eld that serves as a fundamental construct for any new work of literature. Consequently any literary work inevitably implicates a variety of citations in its structure and thus establishes an immanent connection with the general cultural-textual tradition. The undertaken study suggests a unique amorphous existence and non-temporal ontological status of the elements that form the general literary tradition, their direct engagement in the development of new works of literature, as well as validates ample opportunities of literary art interpretation. Keywords: theory of tradition, intertextuality, intertextual relations, post structuralism, text. DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2015-3.2-120-130 References 1. Bart R. Ot proizvedeniya k tekstu [From work to text]. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika; Po- etika [Selected works: Semiotics; Poetics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 413–423. (In Russian) 2. Bloom H. The anxiety of infl uence: a theory of poetry. New York, Oxford University Press, 1973; Bloom H. A map of misreading. New York, Oxford University Press, 1975 (Russ. ed.: Blum Kh. Strakh vliyaniya: teoriya poezii; Karta perechityvaniya. Translated from English S.A. Nikitin. Ekaterinburg, UrGU Publ., 1998. 351 p.). 3. Gadamer H.-G. Wahrheit und methode: grun- dzüge einer philosophischen hermeneutik. Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebek), 1960 (Russ. ed.: Gadam- er Kh.-G. Istina i metod: osnovy fi losofskoi germenevtiki. Translated from German B.N. Bessonov. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988. 704 p.). 4. Sedlmayr H. Kunst und warheit: zur theorie und methode der kunstgeschichte. Hamburg, Rowohlt, 1958 (Russ. ed.: Zedl’mair G. Iskusstvo i istina: teo- riya i metod istorii iskusstva. Translated from German U.N. Popov. St. Petersburg, Axioma Publ., 2000. 272 p.). 5. Il’in I.P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [Poststructuralism. Deconstructiv- ism. Postmodernism]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1996. 253 p. 6. Kosikov G.K. Ot strukturalizma k poststruk- turalizmu: (problemy metodologii) [From Structuralism to Poststructuralism: (problems of methodology)]. Moscow, Rudomino Publ., 1998. 192 p. 7. Kristeva J. Semiotiké: Recherches pour une sé- manalyse. Paris, Éditions du Seuil, 1969 (Russ. ed.: Kristeva Yu. Semiotika: Issledovaniya po semanalizu. Translated from French E.A. Orlova, Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2013. 285 p.). 8. Kristeva Yu. Tekst romana [The text of the novel]. Kristeva Yu. Izbrannye trudy: Razrushenie poetiki [Selected works: Destruction of poetics]. Moscow, ROSSPJeN Publ., 2004, pp. 395–593. (In Russian) |