Вестник казнпу им. Абая, серия «Исторические и социально-политические науки», №1(72), 2022 г
жүктеу/скачать 3.48 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
| Conclusion
In general, the value of ancient written sources and archaeological materials to determine the origin of the savromats and sarmatians is not disputed today. When we look at the information left by Herodotus, it is clear that the savromats are descendants of the Scythians and Amazons. But since ancient times, Herodotus has been criticized for his work and his position on each topic. He was even called the "father of lies" as a nickname. Therefore, we believe that the words of Herodotus about the origin of the savromat- sarmatians should be considered critically. However, in the mounds of the Bronze Age, the discovery of additional graves buried on top of or in the layer of graves belonging to the savromats [24, p.75], as well as the laying of ohra, limestone and dishes with the sign of the fylfot on the surface in accordance with the traditions of the Bronze Age, is a very important information.[16, p.70]. Based on the data, it is logical to consider the savromat-sarmatians to be descendants of tribes that lived in the Bronze Age on the banks of the southern Urals and Volga rivers[25]. Although we welcome the idea that the Sarmatians originated as a result of migration, we believe that it should not be justified only by mandatory migration or occupation. In the formation of sarmatian culture, it is necessary to ignore the cultural relations that took place during the savromat period. Judging from the point of view of cultural relations on this issue, we can say that the savromats went through the process of culturization, preserving their culture. If this view is found to be correct, then it is clear that the tribes called sarmatians are one tribe, because of a number of material and spiritual differences between them and the savromats. References: Абай атындағы ҚазҰПУ-нің ХАБАРШЫСЫ, «Тарих және саяси-әлеуметтік ғылымдар» сериясы, №1(72), 2022 ж. 162 1. Zholdasbaiuly S. Ezhelgі zhne orta gasyrdagy qazaq elіnіn tarikhy [History of the Kazakh country in ancient and medieval times]. – Almaty: Kіtap baspasy, 2010.- 333 p. [in Kazakh]. 2. Grakov B. N. ΓΥΝΑΙΚΟΚΡΑΤΟΥΜΕΝΟΙ (perezhitki matriarkhata u sarmatov). Vestnik drevnei istorii (3) [The remnants of matriarchy, the Sarmatians, Bulletin of Ancient History (3)]. 1947. pp. 100-121. [in Russian]. 3. Kastane I. A. Otchet ob ekspeditsii v Aktiubınskii uezd letom 1904 g. Trudi Orenburgskoi Uchenoi Arkhivnoi Komissii XIV [Report on the expedition to Aktyubinsky uyezd in the summer of 1904 y. Proceedings of the Orenburg Scientific Archival Commission XIV]. – Orenburg: Tipog-ia I.I. Evfimovskogo- Mirovitskago, 1905.- pp. 188-199. [in Russian]. 4. Kastane I. A. Otchet o raskopkakh shesti kurganov v Aktıubınskom uezd letom 1906 g. Trudi Orenburgskoi Uchenoi Arkhivnoi Komissii XIX [Report on the excavation of six burial mounds in Aktyubinsk district in the summer of 1906 y. Proceedings of the Orenburg Scientific Archival Commission XIX]. – Orenburg: Parovaia Tipo-lit, 1907. – pp. 102-116. [in Russian]. 5. Kastane I. A. Obzor arkheologicheskikh raskopok v Turgaiskoi oblasti. Trudi Orenburgskoi Uchenoi Arkhivnoi Komissii, Drevnosti Kırgızskoi stepi i Orenburgskogo kraya XXII [Overview of archaeological excavations in Turgay region. Proceedings of the Orenburg Scientific Archival Commission, Antiquities of the Kirghiz steppe and the Orenburg Region XXII]. - Orenburg: Tipo-lit, 1910. – pp.65-70. [in Russian]. 6. Rykov, P. Dnevnik Arkheologicheskikh raskopok bl.gor Uralska v iyule 1926 g. Arkhivnie materialy Instituta arheologii im. Margulana. delo №187 [Diary of the archaeological excavations of the Uralsk жүктеу/скачать 3.48 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|