Учебно-методический комплекс дисциплины

С.Ж.АСФЕНДИЯРОВ АТЫНДАҒЫ ҚАЗАҚ ҰЛТТЫҚ МЕДИЦИНА УНИВЕРСИТЕТІ		КАЗАХСКИЙ НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ ИМЕНИ С.Д.АСФЕНДИЯРОВА
КАФЕДРА ПОЛИТИКИ И УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ЗДРАВООХРАНЕНИЕМ
УЧЕБНО-МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЙ КОМПЛЕКС ДИСЦИПЛИНЫ

«УТВЕРЖДАЮ»

проректор по УВР

профессор Тулебаев К.А.

________________________

«___»_____________2012 г.

Discipline: "Strengthening the health with the fundamentals of rational of a balanced diet" (elective).

Specialty: 051102 - "Public Health"

The volume of hours: 90 hours (2 credits)

Course: 2nd year

Semester of study: III Semester

Form of control: examination

Almaty - 2012

The work program for the discipline «"Strengthening the health with the fundamentals of rational of a balanced diet» developed by the Department Head, MD B.S.Turdalieva, MD Aimbetova G. E, and teacher Zhunistaeva ZH.K on the basis of SES RK, 2009, Letter of Instruction number 6 on the development of educational-methodical documentation in the medical institutions of Education and Science, which provide training for students.

Protocol № ___ from «___»___________20___ year.

Head of the Department,

MD B.S.Turdalieva.

The work program was discussed at a meeting of the Committee for Educational Programs

Protocol № ___ from «___»___________20___ year.

Chairman __________ Buzhikeeva A.B

Approved by the Methodological Council KazNMU

____________________________________________________________

Protocol № ___ from «___»___________20___ year.
Chairman, Professor ___________ Tulebaev K. A.

Program:

Introduction

The aim of the elektiv is to introduce students with the value and principles of health promotion in public health, health determinants, the value of the WHO in the development and implementation of policies and strategies for health promotion, health policy in Kazakhstan, the organization and management of the national service of a healthy lifestyle.
Summary of Discipline

Fundamental concepts of health promotion. Factors affecting the human health. General characteristics of health and lifestyle of population in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Health promotion - the process of enabling people to increase control over their health and improve it.

The program "Healthy Living" on 2008-2016 years. The purpose, objectives, basic directions and mechanisms of implementation of the program. Quality of life associated with health. The criteria and components of quality quality of human life. Health promotion also includes the principles that underlie a number of strategies aimed at creating conditions that allow people to be healthy and make healthy choices. Formation of skills of in the population of healthy lifestyles and disease prevention and behavioral risk factors contributing health promotion.

Purpose of the study:

Give the knowledge of modern principles of healthy lifestyles, health promotion and prevention of behavioral risk factors, social diseases of adult and childhood based on the evidence of relevant international standards.

Learning objectives:

• 
  To introduce with the basic concepts of health promotion in the public health system is based on evidence;
  
• 
  To introduce with the basic determinants of health;
  
• 
  To introduce with the program of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of socially important communicable and chronic diseases;
  
• 
  To introduce with the role of WHO in the development of health promotion policies in the world, and Kazakhstan;
  
• 
  To introduce with the policy of health promotion in Kazakhstan;
  
• 
  To introduce with the organization and the Office of Healthy Lifestyles in the RK.
  

Learning outcomes

The student must build knowledge:

• 
  About the the regulatory - legal framework to protect the health of citizens;
  
• 
  About Policies and strategies to prevent the major behavioral risk factors and social diseases (smoking, alcohol abuse, drug addiction, tuberculosis, HIV, diabetes, and others);
  
• 
  About the connection between the authority and responsibility of the state and the public to preserve and improve the health of the citizens of the RK;
  
• 
  About the types of decision-making in the management practices for preserving and strengthening the health of the citizens of the RK;
  
• 
  About the individual and public health
  
• 
  About the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of social diseases;
  
• 
  About the formation and development of health policy in Kazakhstan.
  

• 
  On organization of sanitation in the aspect of preserving and strengthening the health of the RK;
  
• 
  On technologies and methods for the formation of healthy way of living;
  

• 
  On organization of health care organizations, primary care in the area of healthy lifestyle, disease prevention and behavioral risk factors.
  
• 
  On organization of prevention and management decisions at different levels of health care organizations in matters of health prevention programs that promote healthy lifestyles for different target groups.
  

Thematic plan

Thematic plan of workshops

The technology of monitoring students' knowledge

I = R х 0,6 + E х 0,4, where

I – the final score

R– rating score for admission

E – evaluation of the final control (examination of the discipline)

Ratings of 60% from I,

Exam -40% of I

Assessment rating of students is made up from of the current and intermediate control.

The first rating is calculated as follows:

Each practical lesson, SSWT, SSW, landmark control are calculated out of 100 points, which corresponds to 100 percent.

The second rating is calculated as follows

t - current control = average rating for the practical lesson (laboratory, workshop) + average for the SSW

Rating of admission to the student's final grade is not less than 60%, so the semester assessment the discipline of students is determined by the formula

In the absence of Intermediate controls the admission rating is calculated only on the current estimates.

In the case of several Intermediate controls the appropriate number of ratings calculated by average rating at the end of the semester.

Technology of carrying out and evaluation of examination.

The maximum percentage of the final control is 100%. The examiner puts the final assessment of control (E) in the exam sheet, using the measurement tools of students knowledge in final control.

Measurement for monitoring the outcome of the oral survey

(Examination on tickets, in the ticket 3 questions)

Measurement of a final control test.

At the exam students are given 50 test questions, that is, each job corresponds to two scores or interest.

№	Quality of work performance	The range of assessment
1	Not performed The absence of an exam without a valid reason	0%
2	Evaluation of knowledge for each question	2%
	in total :	0-100%

The share of the final evaluation of the control is no more than 40% of the final assessment of knowledge in the discipline, so the exams score (E) for the discipline is multiplied by a factor of 0.4:

E x 0.4

Then the final score is calculated by the formula

Final control: an examination.

1. 
   Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on people's health and the health care system.
   
2. 
   State Program for Development of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan "Salamatty Kazakstan" on the 2011 - 2015 years
   
3. 
   The "Healthy Living" on 2008-2016 years.
   
4. 
   Akanov AA Tulebaev KA, N.I.Nazirova, G.U.Kulkaeva. Guidelines for promoting healthy lifestyles and disease prevention Astana 2007
   
5. 
   Akanov AA Devyatko VN, MK Kulzhanov Public health in Kazakhstan: concept, problems and prospects. - Almaty, 2001. -100p.
   
6. 
   Akanov AA Tulebaev KA, Aitzhanova GB Guide FZOZH, disease prevention and health promotion. First edition. Almaty, 2002. - 250 p.
   
7. 
   Aringazina AM, Egeubaeva S. Health promotion: theory and program planning. Almaty, 2003. -158p.
   
8. 
   Akanov AA Germanyuk TA, AA Turekulova Politics and other healthy lifestyles in Kazakhstan (the concept of prevention programs). Almaty, 2003. 159p
   
9. 
   Akanov AA Tulebaev KA, NI Nazirova Guide and other health promotion and disease prevention. Guidance. , Astana, 2007. -115p.
   
10. 
    Prevention through the primary health care. Recommendations for improving the quality of work. Edited L.Dobrossy. - WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2003. -B.: Odyssey 2003. 168p.
    
11. 
    Tulebaev KA, Nersesov A., N. Nazirova Algorithms and other medical professionals PHC activities to promote healthy lifestyles, prevention of risk factors for major social diseases: prevention protocols. -Astana-Almaty, 2007. -96p. (in Kazakh and Russian).
    

Further Reading:

Head course of Ecology

Head Department of Public Health,
MD, Professor Kamaliyev M.A
Head Department of Policy and Management
health, MD Turdalieva B.S

I.2 SYLLABUS

Discipline: "Strengthening the health with the fundamentals of rational of a balanced diet" (elective).

Specialty: 051102 - "Public Health"

The volume of hours: 90 hours (2 credits)

Course: 2nd year

Semester of study: III Semester

Form of control: examination

Almaty - 2012

.

Information about the teachers chair

№	Name teacher	official capacity	Degree, academic status		His research interests, accomplishments
1	Turdalieva Botagoz Saitovna	Head of the Department.	MD		Expert in the field of public health and health care. 50 scientific papers.
	Aimbetova Gulshara Ergazievna	docent	Candidate of Medical Sciences		специалист в области общественного здоровья и здравоохранения. 42 научных трудов.
	Koshimbekov Murat Koshimbekovich.	docent	MD	docent	Expert in the field of public health and health care. 60 scientific papers.
	Абдукаюмова Умитжан Асылбековна	docent	Candidate of Medical Sciences		Expert in the field of public health and health care. 20 scientific papers
	Shegirbaeva Karlygash Baydullaevna	docent	Candidate of Medical Sciences		Expert in the field of public health and health care. 50 scientific papers.
	Ramazanova Manshuk Anerovna	senior Teacher			Expert in the field of public health and health care. 20 scientific papers.
	Kashafutdinova Gulzhahan Temirbulatovna	senior Teacher			Expert in the field of public health and health care. 20 scientific papers.
	Musaev Bakhyt Almasbekovna	Teacher			Expert in the field of public health and health care. 10 scientific papers.
	Zhusupova Zhazira Malikovna	Teacher			Expert in the field of health management
	Kyzaeva Aizhan Dyusenbekovna	Teacher			Expert in the field of public health and health care
3	Zhunystaeva Zhadyra Korykbaevna	Teacher			Expert in the field of public health and health care
2	Kurzhangulova Asem Maksenovna	Teacher			Expert in the field of public health and health care
1	Urazaeva Ulpan Amangeldievna	Teacher			Expert in the field of public health and health care

Contact Information:

• 
  participate actively in the learning process, showing creativity, individuality and creativity;
  
• 
  attend all kinds of classes (lectures, practical classes);
  
• 
  prepare for each class (read a given material, and perform tasks on them);
  
• 
  take time to implement and work strictly on a calendar schedule;
  
• 
  document the missed classroom for a good reason;
  
• 
  All work missed classes at a specified time, a teacher;
  

program:
 

Summary of Discipline

  Postdetails: Public health

The technology of monitoring students' knowledge

I = R х 0,6 + E х 0,4, where

I – the final score

R– rating score for admission

E – evaluation of the final control (examination of the discipline)

Ratings of 60% from I,

Exam -40% of I

Assessment rating of students is made up from of the current and intermediate control.

The first rating is calculated as follows:

Each practical lesson, SSWT, SSW, landmark control are calculated out of 100 points, which corresponds to 100 percent.

The second rating is calculated as follows

t - current control = average rating for the practical lesson (laboratory, workshop) + average for the SSW

Rating of admission to the student's final grade is not less than 60%, so the semester assessment the discipline of students is determined by the formula

In the absence of Intermediate controls the admission rating is calculated only on the current estimates.

In the case of several Intermediate controls the appropriate number of ratings calculated by average rating at the end of the semester.

Technology of carrying out and evaluation of examination.

The maximum percentage of the final control is 100%. The examiner puts the final assessment of control (E) in the exam sheet, using the measurement tools of students knowledge in final control.
Measurement tool for monitoring the outcome of the oral survey
(examination of tickets, the ticket 3 questions).

№	Quality of work	The range of estimates
1	not performed The absence of an exam without a valid reason	0%
2	Evaluation of knowledge on each issue	0-30%
3	Evaluation of additional questions	0-10%
	Total:	0-100%

Measurement tool as a final control test

The share of the final evaluation of the control is no more than 40% of the final assessment of knowledge in the discipline, so the exam score (E) for the discipline is multiplied by a factor of 0.4

E x 0.4

Then calculated the final score

Final inspection: an examination.