Глава 5. Принципалы, агенты и мотивация
1. Michael Jensen and William H. Meckling, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency
Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4 (1976), pp. 305–60;
Bengt Holmström and Paul Milgrom, “Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts,
Asset Ownership, and Job Design”, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization [Special Issue:
Papers from the Conference on the New Science of Organization, January 1991] 7 (1991), pp.
24–52; Charles Wheelan, Naked Economics, rev. ed. (New York, 2010), pp. 39–43.
2. Khurana. From Higher Aims to Hired Hands, pp. 317–26. См. также Richard
Münch, Globale Eliten, lokale Autoritäten (Frankfurt, 2009), p. 75. и Ferraro, Pfeffer, Sutton,
“Economics Language and Assumptions”.
103
3. Theodore M.
Porter, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science andPublic Life (Princeton, 1995), p.
ix.
4. Talbot, “Performance Management”, p. 497.
5. David Chinitz and Victor G. Rodwin, “What Passes and Fails as Health Policy and
Management”, Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 39, no. 5 (October 2014), pp. 1113–26,
esp. pp. 1114–17.
6. Mintzberg, “Managing Government, Governing Management”, pp. 75–83; Holmström
and Milgrom, “Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses”.
7. Hal K. Rainey and Young Han Chun, “Public and Private Management Compared”, in
Ewan Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn, Jr., and Christopher Pollitt
(eds.), The Oxford Handbook ofPublic Management (New York, 2005), pp. 72–102, 85; and James
Q. Wilson, Bureaucracy: What Government Agen cies Do and Why They Do It (New York, 2000),
pp. 156–57.
8. Roland Bénabout and Jean Tirole, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic
Motivation”, Review ofEconomic Studies no. 70 (2003), pp. 489–520. Первопроходческой
работой по теории внутренней мотивации была книга: Edward L.
Deci, Intrinsic Motivation (New York, 1975). В числе других исследований, выполненных
психологами, следует упомянуть: Thane S. Pittman, Jolie Emery, and Ann K. Boggiano,
“Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations: Reward-Induced Changes in Preference for
Complexity”, Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology 42, no. 5 (1982), pp. 789–97; T. S.
Pittman, A. K. Boggiano, and D. N. Ruble, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations:
Limiting Conditions on the Undermining and Enhancing Effects of Reward on Intrinsic
Motivation”, in J. Levine and M. Wang
(eds.), Teacher and Student Perceptions: Implications for Learning (Hillsdale, N.J., 1983). Важной
фигурой в переводе теории из психологии в экономику является Бруно Фрей, в числе работ
которого следует упомянуть книгу: Bruno S.
Frey, Not Justfor the Money: An Economic Theory of Human Motivation (Cheltenham, England,
1997). Обзор литературы по данной теме с акцентом на поведенческой экономике приводит к
выводу о том, что «эффективность распространенной практики применения систем
вознаграждения в зависимости от результативности не подтверждается научными фактами»,
см. в: Antoinette Weibel, Meike Wiemann, and Margit Osterloh, “A Behavioral Economics
Perspective on the Overjustification Effect: Crowding-In and Crowding-Out of Intrinsic
Motivation”, in Marylène Gagné
(ed.), TheOxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory (New
York, 2014).
9. Pittman, Boggiano, and Ruble, “Intrinsic and Еxtrinsic Motivational Orientations”.
10. Bénabout and Tirole, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation”, p. 504.
11. Bruno S. Frey and Margit Osterloh, “Motivate People with Prizes”, Nature 465, no. 17
(June 2010), p. 871.
12. George Akerlof, “Labor Contracts as a Partial Gift
Exchange”, Quarterly Journal ofEconomics 97, no. 4 (1982), 543–69.
13. Bruno S. Frey and Reto Jegen, “Motivation Crowding
Theory”, Journal of EconomicSurveys 15, no. 5 (2001), pp. 589–611; Robert Gibbons, “Incentives
in Organizations”, Journalof Economic Perspectives 12, no. 4 (Fall 1998), pp. 115–32, esp. p. 129.
14. Gibbons, “Incentives in Organizations”.
15. Тalbot, “Performance Management”, pp. 491–517; Adrian
Wooldridge, Masters ofManagement (New York, 2011), pp. 318–19; Pollitt, “Towards a New
World”; Christopher Hood, “The ‘New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a
Theme”, Accounting, Organization, and Society 20, nos. 2/3 (1995), pp. 93–109; Christopher Hood
and Guy Peters, “The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of
Paradox?” Journal of PublicAdministration Research and Theory 14, no. 3 (2004), pp. 267–82. Об
104
истоках и ранней истории сети контроля эффективности труда в Великобритании и США
см.: Christopher Pollitt, Managerialism and the Public Services, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1993).
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |