Республикасы Оқу-ағарту министрлігі


Criteria for evaluating written products in grade 10



бет72/86
Дата16.04.2024
өлшемі0.79 Mb.
#498787
1   ...   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   ...   86
32 Сыныптар бойынша жазба жұмыстарын жүргізуге қойылатын талаптар

Criteria for evaluating written products in grade 10


Mark
/ Criter ion

Content (relevance and
development of ideas)

Organisation (cohesion, paragraphing, and format)

Vocabulary (style andaccuracy)

Grammar (style and accuracy) and Punctuation (accuracy)

6


  • All content is relevant to the task.

  • The register completely corresponds to the

requirements of the task; consistent and intentional misuse of register* may indicate a writer’s personal style.

  • All content points are fully addressed and developed in a balanced way.

  • *Such misuse of register

should not

  • Uses a wide range of connectors

  • Uses

paragraphs to separate ideas; all paragraphs revolve around one idea or a set of like
ideas; the size of each paragraph allows for a proper and balanced developmen t ofideas.

  • The format is appropriate.

  • Uses a range of advanced vocabulary appropriately; uses less common lexical items with

occasional inappropriacies.

  • Has good control of word formation;

may make
occasional errors in producing less
common word forms.

  • Spells common vocabulary items correctly; very few (one or two) occasional spelling mistakes may be present.

  • May occasionally misspell less

common lexical items.

  • Errors in word choice and/or spelling do not

distort meaning.

  • Writes simple and compound sentence forms correctly and demonstrates variety in

length and complexity.




harm the
format of writing.










5

present.

  • The register on the whole corresponds to the

requirements of the task; occasional and inconsistent misuse of register may be present.

  • Most content points are

  • addressed, but their development may be

slightly imbalanced.

  • Uses a

range of basic connectors accurately andattempts to use more advanced connectors, but not always accurately, and referencing, but not always clearly or appropriatel y.

  • Uses

paragraphs to separate ideas; most paragraphs revolve

  • around one idea or a set of like

ideas; the size of each paragraph may reflect imbalanced developmen t ofideas.

  • The format is

appropriate.

  • Uses a range of everyday vocabulary appropriately; uses less common lexical items but may make frequent errors.

  • Has good control of word formation; may make errors in producing less

common word forms.

  • Spells common vocabulary

  • items correctly; few (no more than five) occasional spellingmistakes may be present.

  • May often misspell less common lexical items.

  • Errors in word choice and/or

  • spelling do not distort meaning.

  • Writes simple and compound sentence forms correctly but

does not demonstrate variety inlength.

  • Occasional errors in grammar and/or punctuation do not distort meaning.

4


  • Most content is relevant to the task; insignificant content omissions may be present.

  • The register on the whole corresponds to the requirements of the task.

  • Most content points are addressed, but some content points may be more fully covered than others.

  • Uses a range of basic connectors accurately.

  • Uses

paragraphs to separate ideas, but
tends to misuse paragraphing (a script is a set of very short paragraphs or some paragraphs may be much longer than
other ones for no
apparent reason).

  • The format is generally

appropriate.

  • Uses everyday vocabulary generally appropriately, while occasionally overusing certain lexical items.

  • Has good control of word formation; can produce common word forms correctly.

  • May make infrequent errors in spelling more difficult words.

  • Errors in word choice and/or spelling rarely distort meaning.

  • Writes simple and some compound sentence forms correctly.

  • While errors in grammar and/or punctuation are noticeable, meaning is rarely distorted.

3


  • Some content is relevant to the task; significant content omissions may be present.

  • The register barely corresponds to the requirements of the task.

  • Only some content points, which are minimally addressed.

  • Uses some basic connectors, but these

may be
inaccurate or repetitive.

  • Writes in paragraphs, but may not use them to separate ideas (a

script may have random breaks between paragraphs).

  • The format

may be
inappropriate in places.

  • Uses basic vocabulary reasonably appropriately.

  • Has some control of word formation; can produce some common word forms correctly.

  • Makes frequent errors in spelling more difficult words, but simple words are spelled correctly.

  • Errors in word choice and/or spelling distort meaning at

  • times.

  • Writes simple sentence forms mostly correctly.

  • Errors in grammar and/or punctuation may distort meaning at times.

2


present.

  • Only few content points, which

  • are minimally addressed.

  • May use a very limited range of basic cohesive devices, and those used

may not indicate a logical relationship between

  • ideas.

  • Attempts to write in paragraphs, but their use may be

confusing (may start every sentence with a new line).

  • The format may be

  • inappropriate.

  • Uses an extremely limitedrange of vocabulary.

  • Has very limited control ofword formation; can produce a

  • few common word forms

  • correctly.

  • Makes many errors in spelling, including a range of simple words.

  • Errors in word choice and/or

  • spelling distort meaning.

  • Writes some simple sentenceforms correctly.

  • Frequent errors in grammar and/or punctuation distort meaning.




1

  • Attempts the task, but it is largely misinterpreted and the

response is barely relevant to thetask.

  • Links are missing or incorrect.

  • Does not

write in paragraphs at all (a script is a block of text).

  • The format is not

appropriate.

  • Can only use a few isolated words and/or memorisedphrases.

  • Has essentially no control of word formation; can barely produce any word forms.

  • Displays few examples of

  • conventional spelling.

  • No evidence of sentence forms.

0

  • Does not attempt the task in any way. OR

  • The response is completely irrelevant to the task. OR

  • There is too little language to assess. OR

  • Content is completely incomprehensible due to extremely poor handwriting: very few words are distinguishable, so there is a lack of context to verify meaning.

The content of English language programme in Grade 11:



        • Planning, writing, editing and proofreading at text level independently on a wide range of general and curricular topics using a wide range of vocabulary, which is appropriate to topic and genre, and which is spelt accurately;

        • writing with grammatical accuracy on a wide range of general and curricular topics using style and register to achieve an appropriate degree of formality in a wide variety of written genres on general and curricular topics.

        • Developing with minimal support coherent arguments supported when necessary by examples and reasons for a wide range of written genres in familiar general and curricular topics.

        • Writing coherently at text level using a variety of connectors on a wide range of familiar general and curricular topics.

        • Using independently appropriate layout at text level on a wide range of general and curricular topics.

        • Communicating and responding to news and feelings in correspondence through a variety of functions on a wide range of general and curricular topics.

        • Punctuating written works at text level and a wide range of general and curricular topics with a good degree of accuracy.



Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   ...   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   ...   86




©dereksiz.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет