Шет тілдері факультеті Шет тілдері практикалық курсы кафедрасы АҒылшын тілі «География» мамандығы бойынша студенттердің практикалық сабағына арналған әдістемелік құрал Павлодар



бет10/10
Дата20.07.2016
өлшемі297 Kb.
#211693
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
3.4 нұсқа


3.4.1 Мәтінді оқып, басты ойын анықтаңыз
The Global Problem 1
Of all man’s effects on the environment war has always been the most destructive factor. But whereas in the past wars had a local effect, now the progress of science and technology has led the world to qualitatively new means of mass destruction, capable of wiping out even the trace of life on earth.

Modern weapons and methods of delivery can bring any conflict and consequent destruction of the biosphere to global proportions.

A modern economy is impossible without the concentration of chemicals, fuel and other energy sources, and without the creation of large water reservoirs. Their destruction even by conventional weapons can be accompanied by the extensive devastation of nature, forest fires and floods – regarded as a secondary ecological weapon.

What can be expected of a nuclear conflict, which would lead to the destruction of all that lives on a territory of millions of square kilometers? It should be noted that useful plants are the most sensitive to radiation. In other words, even plants which survived a nuclear explosion would accumulate radioactive elements, increasing danger to man.

In addition to the direct extermination of plants, military operations cause the productive properties of the soil to deteriorate, thickening it. Many cubic kilometers of Earth were shifted in order to build military structures during the two world wars. Trenchers and craters survive for many decades, intensifying soil erosion and requiring substantial efforts to eliminate them.

Military operations destroy inland water bodies, change their regime and the stream flow, regime of locality. During the Great Patriotic War drainage systems were destroyed. Trenches, craters and basements of ruined buildings accumulated water. The result was a greater mosquito population and a greater incidence of malaria. In South Vietnam almost 10 million craters still remain, the majority of which are filled with water of this day.

One of the most dangerous affects of a war is mine-fields on land and at sea and unexploded shells and bombs. These zones are a threat to forest management, agricultural and other operations for a long time. The greatest danger is posed by the first ploughing. In Vietnam hundreds of ploughland lie waste due to the immense number of undetonated bombs and mines.

Severe damage can be inflicted by military operations on the ocean. During the Second World War a total of 5,5 million cubic meters of oil escaped to the ocean from sunken tankers. Today the volume of oil-extraction and transportation has substantially expanded. That is why the degree of the ocean pollution in case of war is difficult to predict.

Military operations affect the animal population, create the risk of total destruction of rare species, catastrophically reduce the scale of agricultural production, promote a sharp rise in the number of small rodents – disease carriers.

Wars inflict an immense damage on reserves. Armed conflicts obstruct international plans designed to combat agricultural pests. In 1977 and 1978 East Africa became the scene of an unprecedented locust invasion. Around Ogaden, where the insects concentrated for multiplication, an effective antilocust campaign was made impossible by a Somali – Ethiopian military conflict. Military operations in many African countries handicapped the fight against the tsetse fly.

An immense danger is spelled by manufacture, testing and stockpiling of nuclear weapons and occurs on the average every three months.

Today any large–scale military conflict will be accompanied by a global – wide impact of the biosphere. Thermonuclear war can result in a full destruction of life on Earthland transform our green planet into a lifeless cosmic body contaminated by radioactive fallout. It follows that in the age of nuclear missile technology global wars are altogether inadmissible.


Мәтінге түсініктеме:

1) belligerents- соғыс жағдайындағы мемлекет;

2) lie waste- күтілмеген, өңделмеген(жерге қатысты;

3) worsen- нашарлау;

4) considerable- елеулі;

5) in addition- сондай-ақ, сол сияқты;

` 6) ending the arms race- жанталаса қарулануды тоқтату;

7) extermination of plants- өсімдіктерді жою;

8) the timber area- орман алқабы;

9) methods of delivery- жеткізу әдістері;

10) to be accompanied - ілеседі;

11) inflict - зиян келтіру;

12) destruction - бұзу;

13) escape - қашқақтау;

14) affect- ықпал ету;

15) forest fires - орман өрттері.



3.4.2 Төмендегі сөздер мен сөз тіркестерін келтіріп, сөйлем құраңыз

global problems of mankind, a climate, the progress of technology, methods of delivery, the biosphere, global proportions, the territory, , energy sources, water reservoirs, radioactive elements, devastation of forests, the timber area


3.4.3 Мына интернациональдық сөздер мен сөз тіркестерін оқып аударыңыз:

- global problems of mankind;

- a climate;

- solving international problems;

- the progress of technology;

- modern weapons;

- methods of delivery4

- conflict;

- consequent destruction;

- the biosphere;

- global proportions;

- hectares;

- the territory;

- a modern economy;

- concentration of chemicals;

- energy sources;

- water reservoirs;

- square kilometers;

- radioactive elements.



3.4.4 Болымсыз префиксті және жұрнақты сөздерге назар аударып, төмендегі қос сөздердің орысша эквиваленттерін беріңіз. Аударманы сөздік бойынша тексеріңіз

destruction, recalculate, impossible, unexploded shells, undetonated bombs, an unprecedented locust invasion, an effective antilocust problem, inadmissible, lifeless



3.4.5 Future Indefinite-де төмендегі сөйлемдерді қолданыңыз:

Мысалы

The problem of peace and disarmament occupies a key position within the system of current and future global problems.

The problem of peace and disarmament will occupy a key position within the system of current and future global problems.

1) A solution of the overall complex of global problems requires the combined efforts of mankind, a climate must be established on our planet that would make this possible;

2) There exists only one way to achieve this, namely by ending the arms race and proceeding to disarmament, and renouncing war as a means for solving international problems;

3) Modern weapons and methods of delivery can bring any conflict and consequent destruction of the biosphere to global proportions.


3.4.6 Мәтін бойынша сұрақтарға жауап беріңіз

1. What is this text about?

2. Do you agree that modern weapons and methods of delivery can bring any conflict and consequent destruction of the biosphere to global proportions?

3. Can a nuclear conflict lead to the destruction of all that lives on a territory of millions of square kilometers?

4. Wars inflict an immense damage on reserves, don’t they?

5. How can military operations destroy inland water bodies? Give the examples from the text.

6. According to the text, what can be regarded as a secondary ecological weapon?

7. What is the most destructive factor of all man’s effects on the environment?


3.4.7 Төмендегі сөйлемдерді ырықсыз етістен действительный залогқа түрлендіріңіз:

Мысалы

Deliberate destruction of ecosystems was practised by the United States during its aggression in Vietnam.

The United States practised deliberate destruction of ecosystems during its aggression in Vietnam.

1) During the Second World War carried out on the territories of 40 states, 50-55 million people were killed, while the number of wounded amounted to 20-25 million;

2) Their destruction even by conventional weapons can be accompanied by the extensive devastation of nature, forest fires and floods regarded as a secondary ecological weapon;

3) Many cubic kilometers of Earth were shifted in order to build military structures during the two world wars.


3.4.8 Предлогтарды қойыңыз

Severe damage can be inflicted … military operations … the ocean. The volume … oil-extraction and transportation has substantially expanded. During armed conflicts … Africa elephants have been shot … helicopters and even killed … guided missiles. The degree … the ocean pollution … case … war is difficult to predict. Trenchers and craters survive … many decades. Modern weapons and methods … delivery can bring any conflict and consequent destruction … the biosphere to global proportions.



3.5 нұсқа


3.5.1 Мәтінді оқып, басты ойын анықтаңыз
Environmental Relationships
The degree of man’s mastery over the earth is, of course, dependent of his understanding of it, and while we have made much progress in this regard there is still much work to do. We often forget that the component parts of the earth environment are parts of a larger whole, interrelated with each other in a variety of ways and on a variety of scales. Thus, we have geologists, hydrologists, climatologists, biologists, and so on, each group concerned chiefly with certain specific parts of the environment. Ecologists go further, recognizing the interrelationships that exist between organisms and their different forms of life found in the region. But geographers go still further, adding the ties that exist between the various elements of the physical environment, and the environmental interactions between regions, and thinking of these environmental elements and regions as parts of a world-wild whole. The understanding of the wholeness of the environment, with man as a part of it, and the study of its relationships not only locally but also on a regional, interregional, and world-wide scale is very important.

Differences in the scale of such environmental interrelationships are well illustrated by the Everglades National Park in southern Florida. Drought inflicted that area, with disastrous destruction of its unique flora and fauna. To begin with, the drought’s lowering of the water surface reduce the number of alligators, and this in turn meant fewer of the water holes that are hollowed out by these largest inhabitants of the swamp. As a result there are fewer of the smaller aquatic organisms that live in the alligator holes and that furnish food for the birds of the region, and so there are fewer birds. On the interregional basis, we find that the water level in the Everglades is determined not only by the rainfall within the region but also by the inflow of water from adjacent swampy areas to the north. And of course drought in southern Florida resulted not from any local conditions but from changes in the world-wide weather patterns.

Thus, the web of interaction ships make the earth environment a very vulnerable one, for change of just one factor may set in motion a sequence of reactions that will upset the whole system. For instance, widespread use of insecticides can eliminate not only insects but also both the birds that feed on them and the plants that are polluted by them. It is now realized that much of man’s destructive effect on the environment results from such chain reactions; and even when there seems to be only a simple and direct attack on nature the probability of related effects must always be taken into account, as a brief mention of other examples will illustrate.

Within the Everglades, for example, man has made this sort of direct attack by illegally killing large numbers of alligators to profit by the sale of their skins. And inflow of water from the regions to the north has been reduced not only by the drought but also by drainage schemes developed there in support of agricultural and settlement programs.

Deforestation of a hillside offers another case of both direct and indirect damage. Where the trees have been cut down there are also local changes in the microclimate, in the vegetation, and in the fauna, and there is increased runoff, with resulting flooding, soil erosion, siltation, and lowering of the water table. Flood initiated in such an area may also spread far out into distant regions, as may the accompanying siltation.

Man’s destruction of the environment is not new, of course. Even in Neolithic time fire, often described as man’s first tool, was used directly against the fauna, for it made possible large kills, even when hunting implements were still very simple. Such hunting was probably a major factor in the extinction of a number of large mammal species in late Pleistocene time, and inevitably their loss initiated other change other changes in the ecology.

In spite of these rather impressive results, however, early man could more or less ignore his own damage to the environment. With his small numbers he didn’t fully occupy the earth, and so, having damaged it in one area, he could always find a new region where he could always find a new region where he could make a fresh start. With simple technology he had to work hard to meet his needs, and so his per capita consumption remained small, and non-consumable goods were usually carefully saved and reused. He used chiefly renewable resources, and because of his small numbers and his small per capita demands he didn’t usually exploit these more rapidly than nature renewed them. Since he changed them very little from their natural form, the waste products from their use could easily decompose, and this prevented the development of any serious problems to waste disposal.

Today our situation has changed greatly in many ways. It is no longer possible to escape from the effects of our own destruction of the environment by moving on to new regions. Greater demands are being made of mineral resources, which in some cases have been largely exhausted; and maintenance of renewable resources is hampered by over- exploitation. More complicated chemical processing of nature’s raw materials has attacked the environment in a number of new ways. It has given us pesticides and herbicides that destroy the flora and fauna on a massive scale. It yields new types of waste products that pollute air, water, and that contribute to our waste disposal problem because they are non-degradable. Plastics, for example, and many pesticides and detergents remain undecomposed indefinitely. Most of these problems are further aggravated by the growing concentrations of large numbers of people in urban regions.

Thus we see that the earth is not indestructible and inexhaustible, as was so long thought but highly vulnerable to the destructive impact of man. It is a delicately balanced system that can easily be damaged, and some of its individual parts can be completely destroyed, beyond man’s power to reconstruct them.

Earth scientists of many kinds must work toward developing an ever fuller understanding of the earth environment, especially its interrelationships, and geographers should to carry on this work, both by undertaking some of the basic research and by correlating the work done by others and interpreting its significance.

If the results of such investigations are to be put to use, however, they must be passed on to the general public, and for this kind of education no other professional group is so well equipped as are geographers. It is their task to develop a citizenry informed on environmental matters. The citizenry must learn to recognize our fundamental dependence on the earth, and they must recognize that the earth environment is a wonderful, beautiful, and complex system of interrelated parts, easily damaged by man’s thoughtless attacks upon it.

Мәтінге түсініктеме:

1) degree - дәреже;

2) interrelated - өзара байланысты;

3) interrelationship - бір бірімен байланыс;

4) tie - байланыс;

5) lower - төмендету, кішірейту;

6) in turn - өз кезегінде;

7) determine - анықтау;

8) vulnerable - сезімтал;

9) eliminate - жою;

10) result from - себеп-салдары;

11) probability - ықтималдылық;

12) spread - жайылу;

13) decompose - іру;

14) prevent – ескерту;

15) raw material - шикізат;

16) yield - беру, шығару;

17) completely – толық;

18) set in motion – шақыру;

19) upset - бұзу;

20) Pleistocene - плейстоценге жататын;

21) no longer - енді қайтып;;

22) general public - жұртшылық;

23) citizens - ел-жұрт;

24) whole - тұтас.
3.5.2 Сөз таптарына назар аудара отырып, мына интернациональдық сөздерді оқып, аударыңыз

geologist, hydrologist, climatologist, biologist, geographer, region, illustrate, unique, flora, fauna, alligator, local, factor, microclimate, neolithic, ignore, start, pesticide, herbicide, plastic, detergent, concentration, balanced, reconstruct, inform


3.5.3 Терминологиялық сөздік бойынша төмендегі сөздер мен сөз тіркестерін дұрыс түсінген-түсінбегеніңізді тексеріңіз

destruction, surface, food, level, rainfall, inflow, insecticide, insect, feed, pollute, deforestation, damage, consumption, vegetation, runoff, flood, soil erosion, siltation, water table, fire, reuse, renewable resources, waste products, waste(s) disposal, exhaust, maintenance, processing


3.5.4 Төмендегі сөз тіркестерін аударыңыз:

1) annual rainfall, daily rainfall, abundant rainfall, artificial rainfall;

2) soil vegetation, wild vegetation, aquatic vegetation, natural vegetation, stabilizing vegetation;

3) reuse waste, reuse water, reuse wastepaper, reuse non-consumable goods;

4) renew forests, renew the supplies of coal;

5) dry processing, waste processing, wood processing, thermal processing, mechanical processing, wastepaper processing;

6) frost damage, flood damage, wind damage, vegetation damage, ecological damage, environmental damage;

7) destruction of soil, destruction of ecosystems, destruction of species of plants and animals, destruction of the ozone screen in the lower stratosphere;

8) city flooding, land flooding, controlled flooding;

9) annual runoff, surface runoff, polluting runoff, continental runoff.


3.5.5 Болымсыз мағынаға ие non-, in-, un-, префикстеріне назар аударып, төмендегі сөздерді аударыңыз

direct-indirect; evitable-inevitable; exhaustible-inexhaustible; vulnerable-invulnerable; destructible-indestructible; degradable-non-degradable; depletable - non-depletable; decomposed-undecomposed


3.5.6 Мәтін бойынша сұрақтарға жауап беріңіз

1. The component parts of the earth environment are parts of a larger whole, aren’t they?

2. What are the consequences of the drought’s lowering of the water surface?

3. What makes the earth environment a very vulnerable one?

4. What damages may lead the cutting down of forests?

5. What was a major factor in the extinction of a number of large mammal species in late Pleistocene time?

6. What has attacked the environment in a number of new ways?

7. Plastics, pesticides and detergents remain undecomposed indefinitely, don’t they?

8. Why can be the earth (delicately balanced system) easily damaged?

9. What is the task of geographers?


3.5.7 Мәтіннен модальды етістікті сөйлемді тауып, қазақ тіліне аударыңыз

3.5.8 Мәтіннен Possessive case-де қолданылған зат есімдер бар сөйлемді тауып, көшіріп алыңыз да, қазақ тіліне аударыңыз

Әдебиет
1 Бурлакова В.В. Физическая и экономическая география: учебное пособие. – M. : Просвещение, 1977. – С.157  160.

2 Завгородняя В.Л., Вихман Т.М.. Природа и человек: пособие по обучению чтению на английском языке. – М., 1987.  С. 10 – 87.

3 Комарова А.И., Окс И.Ю. География мира: уроки английского. – Астрль, 2001. – С. 102.

4 Коссович П.В. Поговорим о Казахстане: aнглийский язык для учащихся старших классов.  Астана, 2002.  С.12 – 15.



5 Хведченя Л.В., Хорень Р.В. Английский язык для поступающих в вузы. – Минск , 2002  С. 254 – 256.






Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10




©dereksiz.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет