Ўзбекистон республикаси олий ва ўрта махсус таълим вазирлиги фарғона давлат университети
between two lexical meanings simultaneously materialized in the context, In the third
жүктеу/скачать 0.64 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
| between two lexical meanings simultaneously materialized in the context, In the third
group the quality picked up may be seemingly unimportant, and it is frequently transitory, but for a special reason it is elevated to the greatest importance and made into a telling feature. Simile – introduced by “as” or “like”, is a comparison between two different objects, intended communicate some resemblance or likeness, while assuming unstated dissimilarities; “He eats like a pig”. Ordinary comparison and simile should not be confused. They represent two diverse processes. Comparison means weighing two objects belonging to one class of things with the purpose of establishing the degree of their sameness or difference. To use a simile is to characterize one object by bringing it into contact with another object belonging to an entirely different class of things. Comparison takes into consideration all the properties of two objects, stressing the one that is compared. Simile excludes all the properties of two objects except one which is made common to them. For example; “The boy seems be as clever as his mother” is ordinary comparison, “boy” and “mother” belong to the same class of objects – human beings and only one qualities is being stressed to find the resemblance. But in the sentence; “Maidens, like moths, are ever caught by glare.” (Byron), we have a simile, “maiden” and “moths” belong to heterogeneous classes of objects and Byron has found the concept moth to indicate one of the secondary features of the concept maiden; i.e. to be easily lured. Another example: “It was that moment of the year when the countryside seems to faint from its own loveliness, from the intoxication of its scents and sounds.” (J. Galsworthy) 45 This is an example of a simile which is half a metaphor. If not for the structural word ‘seems’, we would call it a metaphor. It is a simile where the second member – the human being – is only suggested by the word faint. Periphrasis – is the re-naming of an object by a phrase that brings out some particular feature of the object. The essence of the device is that it is decipherable only in context. If a periphrastic location is understandable outside the context, it is not a stylistic device but merely a synonymous expression, they are also called traditional, dictionary or language periphrasis. Here are some examples of well-known dictionary periphrasis (periphrastic synonyms);the cap and gown (‘student body’). Traditional, language or dictionary periphrasis and the words they stand for are synonyms by nature, the periphrasis being expressed by a word combination. Periphrasis as a stylistic device is a new, genuine nomination of an object, a process which realizes the power of language to coin new names fro objects by disclosing some quality of the object, even though it may be transitory, and making it alone represent the object, but at the same time preserving in the mind the ordinary name of the concept. Here are some such stylistic periphrases: “I understand you are poor, and to earn money by nursing the little boy, my son, who has been so prematurely deprived of what can never be replaced.” (Dickens) The object clause ‘what can never be replaced’ is a periphrasis for the word mother. The concept is easily understood by the reader within the given context, the latter being the only code which makes the deciphering of the phrase possible. This is sufficiently proved by a simple transformational operation, viz. taking the phrase out of its context. The meaning of ‘what can never be replaced’ used independently will bear no reference to the concept mother and may be interpreted in many ways. The periphrasis here expresses a very individual idea of the concept. In some cases periphrasis is regarded as a demerit and should have no place in good, precise writing. This kind of periphrasis is generally called circumlocution. Thus Richard Altick states that one of the ways of obscuring truth “…is the use of circumlocutions and euphemisms.” Stylistic periphrasis can also be divided into logical and figurative. Logical periphrasis is based on one of the inherent properties or perhaps a passing feature of the object described, as in instruments of destruction (Dickens) = ‘pistols’; the most pardonable of human weaknesses (Dickens) = ‘love’; the object of his admiration (Dickens); that proportion of the population which… is yet able to read words of more than one syllable, and to read than without perceptible movement of lips (D.Adams) = ‘half-illiterate’). Figurative periphrasis is based either on metaphor or on metonymy, the key-word of the collocation being the word used figuratively as in ‘the punctual servant of all work’ (Dickens) = the sun; ‘in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes’ (Shakespeare) = misfortune; ‘to tie the knot’ = to marry. There is little difference between metaphor or metonymy on the one hand, ad figurative periphrasis on the other. It is the structural aspect of the periphrasis, which always presupposes a word combination, that is the reason for the division. 46 Note this example of a string of figurative periphrases reinforced by the balanced constructions they are moulded into: “Many of the hearts that throbbed so gaily then have ceased to beat; many of the looks that shone so brightly then have ceased to glow.” (Dickens) жүктеу/скачать 0.64 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|