16
íÂÓðÂÚ˘ÂÒ͇fl ÙËÎÓÒÓÙËfl ä‡ÌÚ‡
3.
Кант И. Критика способности суждения // Кант И. Соч.: в 6 т. М., 1966a. Т. 5.
4.
Кант И. О вопросе, предложенном на премию Королевской берлинской ака-
демии наук в 1791 году: какие действительные успехи сделала метафизика в Герма-
нии со времени Лейбница и Вольфа? // Кант И. Соч. : в 6 т. М., 1966б. Т. 5.
5.
Кант И. Пролегомены…// И. Кант. Соч. : в 6 т. Т. 4 [1]. М., 1965.
Об авторе
Леонард Александрович Калинников — д-р филос. наук, проф. кафедры
философии Института гуманитарных наук Балтийского федерального
университета имени Иммануила Канта, kant@kantiana.ru
THE
PROBLEM OF ANTINOMY OF PURE THEORETICAL REASON
IN KANT’S SYSTEM
L.
A. Kalinnikov
A thorough analysis of the structure of the treatise constituting the first Critique and its com-
parison with the analogous structure of the second and third Critiques show that the Critique of
Pure Reason lacks such an important element as the antinomy of pure theoretical reason. Of course,
it is implied in the text: Kant’s reasoning is based on it and takes it into account. However, it is not
explicitly expressed. Instead of this crucial structural element, which would significantly simplify
the understanding of such a complicated treatise, the Critique of Pure Reason presents the system
of antinomies of the cosmological idea of pure reason. However, these phenomena are not identical —
there is a great difference between the antinomy of pure reason and a system of particular anti-
nomies of one of its ideas. The article addresses this complication and the reasons behind it and ex-
plicates the antinomy, which is reconstructed based on the entire body of Kant’s works. The authors
considers Kant’s resolution of the antinomy.
Key words: antinomy of pure reason, antinomy of practical reason, antinomy of taste, anti-
nomy of reflective judgement, system of antinomies of the cosmological ideas of pure theoretical rea-
son, thesis, antithesis and synthesis of the antinomy of pure reason.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: