Глава 12. Заключение
некоторые из этих заключительных рассуждений приникли в вашу структуру познания. В то время как некоторые убеждения укрепились и расширились, другие, возможно, были пересмотрены и отброшены. Применение вашей подсознательной теории учения к преподаванию, возможно, тоже изменилось. Вероятно, также изменился ваш взгляд на свою роль как преподавателя, на то, как вы должны планировать и проводить уроки, регулировать поведение учащихся и реагировать на выполнение заданий учащимися.
Наша подсознательная теория руководит нашими действиями иногда даже без предварительного обдумывания. Предположим, например, что вы встретились с учащимся, который испытывал трудности в завершении заданий и портил работу других. Как бы вы действовали? Возможно, назначили бы встречу с учащимся, используя беспроигрышный метод Гордона, чтобы достичь взаимоприемлемого образа действий? Осуществили бы своего рода оперантную процедуру, чтобы подкрепить более подходящее поведение? Попытались бы вы подойти к учащемуся при помощи использования модели ровесников? Вероятно, вы бы разработали альтернативный метод, сочетающий в себе некоторые из вышеприведенных процедур с какими-то другими. Решение, к которому вы бы пришли, отражало бы вашу подсознательную теорию учения и то, как действует этот метод.
На протяжении этого текста мы обсудили ряд теоретических находок и того, что было обнаружено в результате исследований, и все это было применимо к педагогическим проблемам. Я надеюсь, что в исследовании этих идей читатель нашел много «самородков», ведущих к созданию более полезной и удовлетворительной личной теории учения.
Выводы
В этой заключительной главе была сделана попытка обобщить и объединить материал, обсуждавшийся ранее. Было дано объяснение пяти заключительным мыслям, поскольку они связаны с содержанием мате- „-.-. риала особого рода. О''
Часть IV. Подведем итоги
677
1. Возникает единая теория обучения в системе образования.
2. Научное исследование установило эффективность многих методик, которые помогают преподаванию и улучшают научение.
3. Ряд характерных особенностей, которые отличают одного учащегося от другого, взаимодействуют с преподаванием и влияют на результаты обучения.
4. Необходимо непосредственно сообщать и демонстрировать выгоды, полученные из формирования идей и понятий учащихся и руководить их стратегическим подходом к обучающим заданиям.
5. Основные навыки обучения и схематические структуры являются частью содержимого материала и должны преподаваться в пределах особых областей.
Эти и другие идеи, которые вы встретили в этом, тексте, должны внести вклад в подсознательную теорию учения и преподавания читателя.
Заключительные упражнения
Еще раз опишите вашу подсознательную теорию учения. Включите раздел, который отражает то, что имеет отношение к преподаванию, если вы не сделали этого раньше. После того как вы закончили, найдите план, который вы заполнили в конце главы 1. Насколько он изменился? При сравнении вашего первоначального и переработанного варианта вы можете рассмотреть ниже приведенные компоненты:
1. Вы уже включили существующие теории в ваше собственное предложение?
2. Улучшили ли вы вашу собственную теорию открытия специальных исследований ?
3. Включили ли вы в большей степени учет характеристик учащихся, которые влияют на различные результаты научения ?
4. Потребовала ли от вас новая теория проанализировать педагогические стратегии и средства, которые вы обычно используете ?
5. Рассматриваете ли вы теперь предполагаемые познавательные результаты и необходимые навыки учащихся и способности, которые требуются для вашего преподавания?
6. Направлено ли теперь ваше преподавание на специфический набор целей учения учащихся?
678
Список литературы
Abel, E. L. (1982). Consumption of alcohol during pregnancy. A review of effects on growth and development of offspring. Human Biology, 54, 421-453.
Abelson, H.,&di Sessa, A. A. (1980). Turtle geometry: The computer as a medium for exploring mathematics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Abikoff, H. (1991). Cognitive training in ADHD children: Less to it than meets the eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(4), 205-209.
Abramson, L. Y, Seligman, M. E. S., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.
Abramson, Т., &Kagen,E. (1975). Familiarization of content and different response modes in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(1), 83-88.
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about prinl. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Akamatsu, T. J., & Thelen, M. H. (1974). A review of the literature on observer characteristics and imitation. Developmental Psychology, 10, 38-47.
Alabiso, F. (1975). Operant control of attention behavior: A treatment for hyperactivity. Behavior Therapy, 6, 39-42.
Allen, K. E., Hart, В., Buell, J. S., Harris, F. R., & Wolf, M. M. (1964). Effects of social reinforcement on isolate behavior of a nursery school child. Child Development, 35, 511-518.
Alien, Т. Е. (1986). Patterns of academic performance among hearing impaired students: 1974 and 1983. In A. N. Schildroth & A. M. Karchner (Eds.), Deaf children in America (pp. 161-206). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
Allport, G. W. (1937). The functional autonomy of motives. American Journal of Psychology, 50, 141-156.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 7061. Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). DSM-IITR. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Foundation for the Blind. (1988). Facts about blindness. New York: Author.
American Heritage Dictionary. (1985). Boston: Houghton- Mifflin.
Ames, C. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 90, 409-421.
Ames, С (1992). Classrooms, goal structures and. student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 26 J-271.
Ames, C, & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Ames, C, Ames, R., &Felker, D. W. (1977). Effects of competitive reward structure and valence of outcome on children's achievement attributions. Juornal of Educational Psychology, 69, 1-8.
Anastopoulus, A. D., DuPaul, G. J., & Barkley, R. A. (1991). Stimulant medication and parenttraining therapies for attention deficit-hyperactiv-ity disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(4), 210-218.
Anderson, C.W., & Smith, E. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Koehler (Ed.), Educator's handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84-111). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Anderson, E. S., Dunlea, A., & Kekelis, L. S. (1984). Blind children's language development: Resolving some differences. Juornal of Child Language, 11, 645-664.
Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, memory and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R. (1983a). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge,. MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson J. R. (1983b). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 361-365.
Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R., Kline, P. J., & Beasley, С. M. (1979). A general learning theory and its application to schema abstraction. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 13 (pp. 277-361). New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, L. (1990). The civics report card. Pnnceton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Anderson, R., Reynolds, R., Schallert, D., & Goetz, E. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, /4,367-381.
Anderson-Inman, L. (1987). Teaching for transfer: Integrating language arts software into the curriculum. The Computing Teacher, (8), 24-29, 39.
Andre, T, & Phye, G. D. (1986). Cognitive learning and education. In G. D. Phye andT. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding thinking and problem solving (pp. 1-19). New York: Academic Press.
Andreasen, С, & Waters, H. S. (1989). Organization during study: Relationships between metamemory, strategy, use and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 190-195.
Anrig, G. E., & LaPointe, A. E. (1989). What we know about what students don't know. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 4-9.
Aronson, E., Blaney, N.. Stephan, C, Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hilis, CA: Sage.
Ashcroft, M. H., & Battaglia, J. (1978). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition. Journal of Expert-mental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 527-538.
Asher, S., & Markell, R. (1974). Sex differences in comprehension of high-and low-interest reading material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 680-687.
Atkinson, J. W. (1958). Towards experimental analysis of human motivation in terms of motive, expectancies and incentives. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nos-trand.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Atkinson, J. W., & Litwin, G. H. (I960). Achievement motive and test anxiety as motives to approach success and avoid failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 52-63
Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 126-133.
Atkinson, R. C, & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory. A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 2. (pp. 90-197). New York: Academic Press.
Ausubel, D. P. (1954). Theory and problems of adolescent development. New York: Grune and Stratton.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
Ausubel, D. P. (1964). Some psychological and educational limitations of learning by discovery. The Arithmetic Teacher, 11, 290-302.
Ausubel, D. P., & Fitzgerald, D. (1962). Organizer, general background and antecedent learning variables in sequential verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 243-249.
Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F, G. (1969). School learning: An introduction to educational psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ausubel, D. P.,& Youssef, M. (1963). Role of discriminability in meaningful parallel learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 331 -336.
Ausubel, D. P., Sullivan, E. V, & Ives, W. (1980). Theory and problems of child development (3rd ed.). New York: Grune & Stratton.
681
682
Baddeley, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhait's framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 85, 139-152.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Baddeley, A. D^, & Hitch, С (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 8. New York: Academic Press.
Bailey, S. M. (1993). The current status of gender equity research in American schools. Educational Psychologist, 28(4), 321-339.
Baker, D. (1986). Sex differences in classroom interactions in secondary science. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 22, 212-218.
Balajthy, E. (1989). Computers and reading: Lessons from the past and the technologies of the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Balson, P. M., Ebner, D. G., Mahoney, J. V., Lippert, H. Т., & Manning, D. T. (1986). Videodiscinstructiona! strategies: Simple may be superior to complex. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 14(4), 273-281.
Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 211-269). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1978). The self-system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4),344-358.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Eduational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
Bandura, A., & Cerrone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 1017-1028.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic inteiests through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963a). A comparative test of the status envy, social power and secondary reinforcement theories of identifi-catory learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 527-534.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963b). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 601-607.
Bangert, R., Kulik, I, & Kulik, С (1983). Individualized systems of instruction in secondary schools. Review of Educational Research, 53, 143-158.
Bangert-Downs, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, С L. (1985). The effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 12(3), 59-68.
Banks, J. A. (1988). Multiethnic education: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Banks, J. A. (1989). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. Banks & C. McGee Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (pp. 2-26). Boston: Allyn <&Bacon.
Barbe, W., & Swassing, R. (1979). Teaching through modality strengths: Concepts and practices. Columbus, OH: Zaner-Bloser.
Barclay, L. K. (1985). Infant development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Barkley, R. A. (1981). Hyperactive children: Л handbook of diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford.
Barkley, R. A., & Cunningham, С F. (1978). Do stimulant drugs improve the academic performance of hyperkinetic children? Clinical Pediatrics, 8, 137-146.
Barkley, R. A., Karlsson, J., Strzelecki, E., & Murphy, J. (1984). Effects of age and Ritalin dosage on the mother-child interactions of hyperactive children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 750-758.
Barr, R. D., Earth, J. L., & Shermis, S. S. (1977). Defining the social studies. Arlington, VA: National Council for the Social Studies.
Bartlett, B. J. (1978). Top-level structure as an organizational strategy for recall of classroom text. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
Bartlett, E. J. (1981). Learning to write: Some cognitive and linguistic components. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Barton, P. E., &Coley, R.J. (1991). Performance at the top from elementary through graduate school. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Baumgart, D., Brown, L., Pumpian, I., Nisbet, J., Sweet, M., Messina, R., & Schroeder, J. (1982). The principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in education programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped,!'(2), 17'-21. ■
Baumrind, D. (1973). The development of instrumental competence through socialization. In A.D. Pick {Ed.),.Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bayley, N. (1935). The development of motor abilities during the first three years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development: No. 1.
Bayman, P., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Using conceptual models to teach basic computer programming. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 291-298.
Beach, Т., & Steenwyk, F. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders' summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297-306.
Beak Healthy (1991). Drugs on campus. Watkins Health Center Bulletin-University of Kansas, 5(2), 2-3.
Beaugrande, P. de (1984). Text production: Toward a science of composition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Becker, H. J., & Moursund, J. (1985). The second national U.S. survey of instructional uses of school computers. In K. A. Duncan and D. 1. Harris (Eds.), Computers in education. New York: Elsevier.
Becker, W. C, Engelrriann, S., & Thomas, D. R. (1971). Teaching: A course in applied psychology. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
Beech, M. (1983). Simplifying text for mainstreamed students. Journal of
Learning Disabilities, 16(1),400-402. Bell, M. F. (1985). The role of instructional theories in the evaluation of
microcomputer software. Educational Technology, 25(3), 36-40.
Benbow, С. Р. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 24, 719-725.
Bennett, W. J. (1991). Moral literacy and the formation of character. In J. S. Benninga (Ed.), Moral character and civic education in the elementary school (pp. 131-138). New York: Teachers College Press.
Bereiter, C. (1990). Aspects of an educational learning theory. Review of
Educational Research, 60(4), 509-515. Berger, T. W. (1984). Long-term potentiation of hippocampal synaptic
transmissions affects rates of behavioral learning. Science, 224, 627-630.
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
Berkowitz, S. J. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth grade students' memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly^!, 161-178.
Berliner, D. С (1987). Ways of thinking about students and classrooms by more or less experienced teachers. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 60-83). London: Cassell.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905)". New methods for the diagnosis of the intellectual level of the abnormal. L'Annee Psychologique, 11, 236-245.
Bingham, A. (1986). Using writing folders to document student progress. In T. Newkirk & N.Atwell (Eds.), Understanding writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Birnbauer, J. S., Wolf, M. M, Kidder, J. D., &Tague, С. Е. (1965). Classroom behavior of retarded pupils with token reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2, 219-235.
Black, J. E., & Greenough, W. T. (1986). Induction of pattern in neural structure by experience: Implications for cognitive development. In M. E. Lamb, A. L. Brown, & B. Rogoff (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology: Vol. 4 (pp. 1-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Литератураj^|
Blatt, M. М, & Kohlberg, L. (1975). The effects of classroojn moral discussions upon children's level of moral judgment. Journal of Moral Education, 4(2), 129-161.'
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). 1985. Developing talents in young people. New York: Ballentine.
Blumenfeld, P. C, Solovvay, E., Mark, R. W., Kracjik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivation project-based learning. Sustaining the doine, supporting the leamins. Educational Psychologist, 26~(3&4), 369-398.
Bosco, J. (1986). An analysis of evaluations of interactive video. Educational Technology, 26(5), 7-17.
Bousfield, W. A. (1953), The occurrence of clustering in randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology, 49, 229-240.
Bower, E. M. (1969). The early identification of emotionally-handicapped children in school. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.
Bower, G., Clark, M, Lesgold, A., & Winzerz, D. (1969). Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorical word lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 323-343..
.Boyer, E. (1990). Civic education for responsible citizens. Educational Leadership, 48(3), 4-7.
Bradley, R. H., Caldwell, В. М, & Elardo, R. (1977). Home environment, social class, and mental test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 697-701.
Bradshaw, J. L., & Gates, E. A. (1978). Visual field differences in verbal tasks. Effects of task familiarity and sex. Brain and Language, 5, 166-187.
Brainerd, C. J. (1978). Learning research and Piagetian theory. In L. L. Siegel & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Alternatives to Piaget: Critical essays on the theory (pp. 69-100). New York: Academic Press.
Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2,331 -380.
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York: Freeman.
Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961). The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 16, 681-684.
Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1979). Notetaking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 145-153.
Bridwell, L. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' trans-actional writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 74(3), 107-122.
Brody, С. Н., & Stoneman, Z. (1985). Peer imitation: An examination of status and competence hypotheses. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146, 161-170.
Bromage, B. K., & Mayer, R. E, (1981). Relationship between what is remembered and creative problem-solving performance in science learn- nnr mg. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73,451-461. DOu
Литература
Brooks, L..W., Dansereau, D. R, Holley, С D., & Spurlin. J. E. (1983). Generation of descriptive text readings. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 103-108.
Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). Activities as instructional tools: A framework for instructional analysis and evaluation. Educational Researcher, 20, 9-23.
Brophy, J., &Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
Brophy, J., & Rohrkemper, M. (1981). The influence of problem ownership on teacher's perceptions of and strategies for coping with problem students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73,285-311.
Brown, A, L. (1981). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In M. L. Hamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction (pp.21-42). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
Brown, A. L, &Day, J. P. (1983). Microroles for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of "Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic.models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192.
Bruner, J. S. (1962a). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1962b). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Some elements of discovery. InL. S. Shulman& E. R.
Kiesler (Eds.), Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal (pp. 101-114).
Chicago: Rand McNally. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking.
New York: Wiley.
Bubules, N. C, & Linn, M. С (1988). Response to contradiction: Scientific reasoning during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 67-75.
Burke, P. E. (1989). A different interpretation of the data: Most students know a lot. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 6.
Burns, P. K., & Bozeman, W. С (1981). Computer-assisted instruction
and math achievement. Is there a relationship? Educational Technology,
21(10), 32-39. Burwell, L. (1991). The interaction of learning styles with learner control
treatments in an interactive videodisc lesson. Educational Technology,
31(3), 37-43.
Bushell, D., Wrobel, P., & Michaelis, M. (1968). Applying group contingencies to the classroom study behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, I, 55-61.
Byrne, В., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1990). Acquiring the alphabetic principle: A case for teaching recognition of phoneme identity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (4), 805-812.
Byrne, В., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451-455.
Caine, G., & Caine, R. N. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York: Norton.
Canter, L. (1989). Assertive discipline—More than names on the board and marbles in ajar. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, (1), 41-56.
Canter, L. (1989). Assertive discipline: A response. Teachers College Record, 90(4), 631-638.
Canter, L., & Canter, M. (1976). Assertive disciplined take charge approach for today's educator. Santa Monica, CA: Canter and Associates.
Cantwell, D. P., & Baker, L. (1991). Association between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(2), 88-95.
Carbo, M., Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1986). Teaching students to read through their individual learning styles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HalL
Carlson, N. R. (1986). Psychology of behavior (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Carpenter, T. P. (1985). Learning to add and subtract: An exercise in problem-solving. In E. A.Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 123-161). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carr, Т. Н. (1981). Building theories of reading ability: On the relation between individual differences in cognitive skills and reading comprehension. Cognition, P(l), 71-114.
Carrier, С. А., & Titus, A. (1981). Effects of note-taking pretraining and test mode expectation on learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 18(4), 385-397:
Carrow, M. A. (1957). Linguistic functioning of bilingual and monolingual children. Journal, of Speech and Hearing Disabilities, 22, 371-377.
Carter, J. F. (1993). Self-management: Education's ultimate goal. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25(3), 28-32.
Cartledge, G., & Milburn, J. F. (1986). Teaching social skills to children. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Casanova, U. (1987). Ethnic and cultural differences. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educator's handbook: A research perspective. New York: Longman.
Chalfant, J., & Scheffelin, M. A. (1969). Central processing dysfunctions in children: A review of research. Urbana, IL: Institute for Research on Exceptional Children.
687
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |