Руководитель работ



бет8/10
Дата28.06.2016
өлшемі0.56 Mb.
#163328
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

Заключительные положения


В научной литературе социальное предпринимательство понимается как средство создания общественно значимых благ. Это относительно новая независимая область исследования, которая рассматривает социальное действие и его результат и освещает роль «встроенности» инициатора и участников социального предпринимательства в общественные структуры и систему ценностей. Одним из спорных вопросов остается статус социального предпринимательства как самостоятельной области исследования и самостоятельного явления общественной и экономической деятельности наряду с деятельностью некоммерческих организаций, благотворительностью, социально ответственным поведением бизнеса. Одной из главных отличительных черт социального предпринимательства является то, что оно отдает приоритет созданию общественного продукта над прибылью и использует для достижения социального блага социальные и экономические инновации, что в результате способствует ускорению социальных изменений и удовлетворению общественных потребностей. При этом социальное предпринимательство выступает в многообразных формах в зависимости от социально-экономических и культурных условий.

Рабочее определение социального предпринимательства сочетает элементы социального и предпринимательского. Исследования по социальному предпринимательству с очевидностью базируются на предшествующем опыте предпринимательской деятельности и учитывают его. Подходы и конструкции, выросшие из исследований по предпринимательству в бизнес-секторе, определили первые попытки концептуализации социального предпринимательства. Возможно, подъем социального предпринимательства, как в практической, так и в теоретической сфере, даст ему возможность переосмысливать сложившиеся понятия и устоявшиеся теории, с одной стороны, и выработать некоторую объединяющую парадигму, с другой.


Библиография




  1. Acs, Zoltan J. State of literature on small to medium-size enterprises and entrepreneurship in low-income communities. Conference on Entrepreneurship in Low- and Moderate-Income Communities. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and the Kauffman Foundation. 2006. 33 pp.

  2. Aldrich, H.E. & Zimmer, C. (Eds.). “Entrepreneurship through social networks” in The art and science of entrepreneurship. Cambridge, MA: Sexton and Smilor Ballinger, 1986.

  3. Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2004, 40(3): 260–282.

  4. Anderson, A. R. Cultivating the garden of Eden: Environmental entrepreneuring. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1998, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 135-144.

  5. Andrews, K. T. Social movements and policy implementation: 1965 to 1971. American Sociological Review, 2001, 66(1): 71–95.

  6. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. Social entrepreneurship and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? (Working paper series no. 04-029, 2003). Harvard Business School.

  7. Ashoka: Innovators for the Public “The entrepreneur’s revolution and you”, 2000, Ashoka Web page: http://www.ashoka.org/fellows/entrepreneurs_revolution.cfm

  8. Ashoka: Innovators for the Public. “What is a social entrepreneur?”, 2000, Ashoka Web page: http://www.ashoka.org/fellows/social_entrepreneur.cfm

  9. Bloomfield, C. Cheap creates opportunities for rehabbers: South Shore Bank’s success seen as premier model. Multi-Housing News, 1999, August.

  10. Bollier, D. Aiming higher: 25 stories of how companies prosper by combining sound management and social vision. New York: American Management Association, 1996.

  11. Bornstein, D. Changing the world on a shoestring. Atlantic Monthly, 1998, 281(1): 34–39.

  12. Boschee, J. Social entrepreneurship. Across the Board, 1995, 32(3): 20–25.

  13. Boschee, J. Merging mission and money: A board member’s guide to social entrepreneurship. 1998, http://www.socialent.org/pdfs/MergingMission.pdf.

  14. Bourdieu, P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

  15. Brinckerhoff, P.C. Social entrepreneurship: The art of mission-based venture development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

  16. Burt, R. S. Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.

  17. Burt, R. S. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(2): 339–365.

  18. Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., III, Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 2003, 29(3): 285–308.

  19. Colin, J. Maharey goes hunting social entrepreneurs. New Zealand Management, 2001, Vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 58-61.

  20. Collins, J. Good to great. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2001.

  21. Community Action Network. Definition: What are social entrepreneurs? Community Action Network, 2001, Web page: http://www.can-online.org.uk/entrepreneurs/definition.htm

  22. Dawson, S. & Kreiner, S. Cooperative Home Care Associates: History and Lessons. Home Care Associates Training Institute, 1993, January.

  23. Dees, J.G. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Stanford Graduate School of Business, 1998, Web page: http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/services/news/DeesSocentrepPaper.html

  24. Dees, J.G., Emerson, J. & Economy, P. Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

  25. Dees, J. G., & Elias, J. The challenges of combining social and commercial enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1998, 8(1): 165–178.

  26. DiMaggio, P. J. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (1988, pp. 3–22). Ballinger: Cambridge, MA.

  27. Drayton, W. The citizen sector: Becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 2002, 44(3): 120–132.

  28. Drucker, P.F. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper Business, 1985.

  29. Drucker, P.F. What business can learn from nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 1989, Vol.67, No. 4, pp. 88-93.

  30. Drucker, P.F. Managing the non-profit organization: Principles and practices. New York: Harper Business, 1990.

  31. Emerson, J. The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. CaliforniaManagement Review, 2003, 45(4): 35–51.

  32. Fligstein, N. Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 1997, 40(4): 397–405.

  33. Fukuyama, F. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press, 1997.

  34. Gargiulo, M., & Bernassi, M. The dark side of social capital. In R. Leenders, & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 298–322). Boston: Kluwer, 1999.

  35. Gartner, W. Who is the entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 1988, 12(4): 11–32.

  36. Giddens, A. Central problems in social theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979.

  37. Giddens, A. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.

  38. Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3): 481–510.

  39. Granovetter, M. S. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria, & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 25–26). Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.

  40. Guclu, A., Dees, J. G.,&Anderson, B. B. The process of social entrepreneurship: Creating opportunities worthy of serious pursuit. Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship: Duke—The Fuqua School of Business, 2002.

  41. Hagen, E.E. On the theory of social change: How economic growth begins. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, 1962.

  42. Hamilton, R.T. & Harper, D.A. The entrepreneur in theory and practice. Journal of Economic Studies, 1994, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 3-18.

  43. Hébert, R.F. & Link, A. N. In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small

  44. Business Economics, 1998, 1: 39-49.

  45. Hisrich, R.D. & Peters, M.P. Entrepreneurship (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, 1998.

  46. Independence Care System: Assisting people with disabilities to live independently. Company literature.

  47. Holm, P. The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(3): 398–422.

  48. Inserra, A., Conway, M. and Rodat, J. Cooperative Home Care Associates:A case study of a sectoral employment development approach. The Aspen Institute, 2002, February.

  49. Johnson, J. Banking on Baku. Crain’s Chicago Business, March 27, 2000.

  50. Johnson, S. Social entrepreneurship literature review. Social Entrepreneurs Network, 2002. Available: http://www.sen.org.au/resources/papers/1044853770_18331.html

  51. Kuhnert, S. An evolutionary theory of collective Action: Schumpeterian entrepreneurship for the common good. Constitutional Political Economy, 2001, 12: 13-29.

  52. Leadbeater, C. The rise of the social entrepreneur. Demos, 1997.

  53. Lewin, K. Frontiers in group dynamics: Concepts, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1947, 1: 5-41.

  54. Mair J., Marty I. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business 41, 2006, 36–44.

  55. Marshall, J. Community banking profile: A beacon in poor neighborhoods. US Banker, 1999, March.

  56. Martin, D. Hiring welfare recipients and making them management. New York Times, 1994, May 21.

  57. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

  58. McDaniel, B.A. A survey on entrepreneurship and innovation. The Social Science Journal, 2000, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 277-284.

  59. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242–266.

  60. National Center for Social Entrepreneurs, (2001). Merging mission, market and money: A nonprofit’s guide to social entrepreneurship. SCSE Web page: http://socialentrepreneurs.org/m.monograph.pdf

  61. Osborn, D. A poverty program that works. The New Republic, 1989, May 8.

  62. Osborne, R.L. The essence of entrepreneurial success. Management Decision, 1995, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp.4-9.

  63. Pasmore, W. and Khalsa, G. The contributions of Eric Trist to the social engagement of social science. Academy of Management Review, 1993, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 546-569.

  64. Penrice, D. Entrepreneurship with a difference: Making enterprise pay out in social gains. Summer, 2001. Harvard Business School Web page: http://www.hbs.edu/newbusiness/difference.doc

  65. Peters, T.J. & Waterman, R.H. Jr. In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1982.

  66. Portes, A. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 1998, 24(1): 1–24.

  67. Quint, M. A bank shows it can profit and follow a social agenda. The New York Times, 1992, May 24.

  68. Reed, R. Thinking small: S. Shore Bank’s strategy boosts black entrepreneurs. Crain’s Chicago Business, 1990, July 16.

  69. Riley, M. Social entrepreneurship meets cause marketing. Bank Marketing. Bank Marketing Association, 1999, July.

  70. Ripsas, S. Towards an interdisciplinary theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1998, 10: 103-115.

  71. Sagawa, S., & Segal, E. Common interest, common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnership. California Management Review, 2000, 42(2): 105–122.

  72. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. Entrepreneurs in service of the poor— Models for business contributions to sustainable development. Business Horizons, 2005a, 48(3): 241–246.

  73. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. Sustainable development, sustainable profit. European Business Forum, 2005b, 20: 49–53.

  74. Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. Entrepreneurial motivation. Human resource management review, 2003, 13(2): 257–279.

  75. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(1): 217–226.

  76. Schuyler, G. Social entrepreneurship: Profit as a means, not an end, 1998, November.

  77. Smale, G., Tuson, G. and Statham, D. (2000). Social work and social problems. New York: MacMillan.

  78. Srivastva, A. In search of noble organizing: A study in social entrepreneurship. – PhD Diss, Case Western Reserve University, 2004.

  79. Stanford Graduate School of Business: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies. “Social Entrepreneurship”, 1998. Available: www.gsb.stanford.edu/ces/social_entrepreneurship.html

  80. Taub, R. P. Community capitalism: The south shore bank’s strategy for neighborhood revitalization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1988.

  81. Thompson, J., Alvy, G., & Less, A. Social entrepreneurship: A new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 2000, 38(5): 328–338.

  82. Venkataraman, S. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (1997, Vol. 3, pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  83. Visagie, J. C. & Botha, C.J. Contextual and empirical approach to social change and social responsibilities. Management Decision, 1998, Vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 694-701.

  84. Waddock, S. A. Building successful partnerships. Sloan Management Review, 1988, 29(4): 17–23.

  85. Waddock, S. A., & Post, J. E. Catalytic alliances for social problem solving. Human Relations, 1995, 48(8): 951–972.

  86. Weick, K. Definition of theory. In N. Nicholson (Ed.), Blackwell dictionary of organizational behavior (pp. 565–567). Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.

  87. Yunus, M. Banker to the poor: Microlending and the battle against world poverty. New York: Public Affairs, 1999.




Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10




©dereksiz.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет